OK, Bruce. I'm feeling dense but curious. What was the point of the
incredibly long title? --dawn

It was a little "dig" at a complaint about a previous post, which had a
title that was deemed not-descriptive enough to work out what the URL link
which made up the body of the message pointed to...

Regards
Simon
"dawn" <dawnwolthuis (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote

"Simon Verona" <nomail (AT) nomail (DOT) zzz> wrote

Yeah, what Simon said! (see prior [OT] posting by me concerning an
interesting article on Microsoft and a subsequent reply to the post)

And doncha just hate discussions "about" conversations, that are
longer than the conversations themselves? Sort of like bloated XML
metadata wrapped around tiny data packets.