dbTalk Databases Forums  

New law in Massachusetts require encryption of data

comp.databases.pick comp.databases.pick


Discuss New law in Massachusetts require encryption of data in the comp.databases.pick forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old   
Tony Gravagno
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: New law in Massachusetts require encryption of data - 04-30-2010 , 02:48 PM






Bill Crowell wrote:

Quote:
Having read the statute in its entirety,... Having actually read the
HIPAA statute ...Looking at what is mandated...
Bill, you have my deepest respect for actually going to the source and
reading it.

These days too many people talk about killing grandma, disappearing
gun rights, socialism, and all sorts of other stupidity without
bothering to actually read the documents about which they're
complaining (or a dictionary).

My response is simply "where does it say that?" Show me the text of
the legislation (or technical document) and let's see if it's explicit
or subject to interpretation. Unfortunately too many people spouting
unsubstantiated rhetoric will continue to argue even when the facts
are presented right in front of them. It's tough to have a battle of
wits with unarmed opponents.

Kudos to you Bill.

T

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old   
Scott Ballinger
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: New law in Massachusetts require encryption of data - 05-02-2010 , 01:41 PM






This thread seems particularly rife with alarmist misinformation.

Firstly, why shouldn't internet sales be subject to local sales tax?
Why should purchases from Amazon and other internet retailers be
exempt from the sales taxes that local merchants are required to
collect? It seems a rather unfair burden to force local businesses to
subsidize their internet competition. In WA state, businesses that buy
supplies via mail-order or the internet and don't pay sales tax are
subject to a self-reported "use tax." It's the first thing on the
auditor's checklist. My guess is that most other states have similar
laws.

Secondly, regarding NC, my understanding is that rather than comply
with a law requiring internet retailers with affiliates in NC to
collect NC sales tax, Amazon simply fired all their NC affiliates.

NC has also offered a "tax amnesty" program to all internet retailers,
where if they agree to start collecting sales tax on NC purchases from
Sept 1st onwards they will be exempt from all taxes, penalties and
interest for prior sales.

States need tax revenue to deliver essential services including
police, fire, health, and education. Local tax laws reflect this
reality. Communities rely on local businesses to create jobs and
provide market solutions to local needs. Local retail purchases should
be subject to local tax laws, regardless of whether the transaction
takes place at the corner store, via mail order, or over the internet.
Amazon does not need nor deserve a tax subsidy.

/Scott Ballinger
Pareto Corporation
Edmonds WA USA
206 713 6006
On Apr 30, 6:09*am, "Ed Sheehan" <NOedsS... (AT) xmission (DOT) com> wrote:
Quote:
Speaking of NC, I heard that they're "requiring" Amazon.com to retrieve
their sales records for the last seven years, and forward it to NC. The
state will then go through all the sales reseipts, identify the customers,
and demand from them sales tax for their Amazon purchases. Amazon never
charged sales tax to NC residents, since they have no warehousing facilities
there, so they're saying "no thanks" to NC's "requirement."

Live free.

Ed

Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.