Microsoft and Novell, all hugs n kisses

#11

NickQ wrote:

Quote:

When our Software is evaluated by a potential client, these clients are
Billion Dollar multi-national reinsurance companies, the environment
upon which we run and the database wherein we will store the client's
data are and extremely important part of the process.

I"m surprised you push MV at all. It seems you would have more success
with Oracle, DB2, or some other widely known/used platform.

Quote:

SInce our future marketplace is in Europe, doing it with a British
company makes sense.

Not that it matters much in your case, but QM is from a British
company.

--
Kevin Powick

#12

Kevin,

Oracle, DB2, even MS-SQL with embedded tables do not handle "many to
many" relationships very easily, our contract file has over 250
attributes with 36 table lookups and 5 'sets' of Associated MV.

Our few competitors who use those have 10 times as many staff as we
do... simple, really, they can not compete on functionality or cost.

Nite,

Nick

Kevin Powick wrote:

Quote:

NickQ wrote:

When our Software is evaluated by a potential client, these clients are
Billion Dollar multi-national reinsurance companies, the environment
upon which we run and the database wherein we will store the client's
data are and extremely important part of the process.

I"m surprised you push MV at all. It seems you would have more success
with Oracle, DB2, or some other widely known/used platform.

SInce our future marketplace is in Europe, doing it with a British
company makes sense.

Not that it matters much in your case, but QM is from a British
company.

--
Kevin Powick

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Microsoft and Novell, all hugs n kisses

comp.databases.pick comp.databases.pick

Re: Reality vs QM - 11-07-2006 , 05:49 PM

Re: Reality vs QM - 11-07-2006 , 06:57 PM