Thanks for your response. So far, the 'single' ISELECT command works
significantly faster than a regular SELECT, and matches items selected
perfectly. After some additional testing and analysis of returned
messages, I've made some changes to use ISELECT for the primary 'mass'
select, followed by a series of 'normal' SELECTs to trim the list down
further. mvE ISELECT does have its limitations in this context.
iakovos (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote:
Quote:
mve had probs with Indexed files as far as I remember. We tried to use
it once too but found that firstly it wasn't exactly what it was
professing to be, and secondly wasn't all that much faster than the
normal file access mechanisms provided.
I don't know of any limitations to ISELECT but check your syntax again. |