![]() | |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Assume someone from a purely RDBMS background wants to learn Pick. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <1b0b566c.0407141656.2568b3c8 (AT) posting (DOT) google.com>, michael (AT) preece (DOT) net says... Assume someone from a purely RDBMS background wants to learn Pick. The "problem" I run into with these people is that it is hard to get them to stop thinking in terms of how they would accomplish the same task in a RDBMS. An analogy would be to learning a foreign language (spoken). Many people make the mistake of trying to translate (in their head) everything they're hearing, back into their native language. Not only is this too slow for them to keep up, but it hinders their progress. I'm not saying the RDBM person should forget everything they know, just try not to keep thinking how they would do it in RDBMS. I remember that I was not overly impressed with Pick when I first started using it (mid 80's). It takes a little time working on real- world projects before one starts to realize the niceties of the data model. The one thing that most RDBMS people will probably cringe about is having to maintain data integrity at the application level. Lack of "modern" admin and dev tools can also put them off. -- Kevin Powick |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Kevin, It might be considered a bit rude to respond to a legitimate question by refering to "these people". This isn't comp db theory after all. Check out www.jes.com for documentation and Pick Basic, the basic language of Pick and Pick-like databases. Do a search on "Malcolm Bull" and find his on-line encyclopedia. Mark Brown "Kevin Powick" <nospam (AT) nomail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:MPG.1b5fc40161d2f9b898982a (AT) news21 (DOT) on.aibn.com... In article <1b0b566c.0407141656.2568b3c8 (AT) posting (DOT) google.com>, michael (AT) preece (DOT) net says... Assume someone from a purely RDBMS background wants to learn Pick. The "problem" I run into with these people is that it is hard to get them to stop thinking in terms of how they would accomplish the same task in a RDBMS. An analogy would be to learning a foreign language (spoken). Many people make the mistake of trying to translate (in their head) everything they're hearing, back into their native language. Not only is this too slow for them to keep up, but it hinders their progress. I'm not saying the RDBM person should forget everything they know, just try not to keep thinking how they would do it in RDBMS. I remember that I was not overly impressed with Pick when I first started using it (mid 80's). It takes a little time working on real- world projects before one starts to realize the niceties of the data model. The one thing that most RDBMS people will probably cringe about is having to maintain data integrity at the application level. Lack of "modern" admin and dev tools can also put them off. -- Kevin Powick |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Mark Brown" <mbrown (AT) drexelmgt (DOT) com> wrote Kevin, It might be considered a bit rude to respond to a legitimate question by refering to "these people". This isn't comp db theory after all. Check out www.jes.com for documentation and Pick Basic, the basic language of Pick and Pick-like databases. Do a search on "Malcolm Bull" and find his on-line encyclopedia. Mark Brown "Kevin Powick" <nospam (AT) nomail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:MPG.1b5fc40161d2f9b898982a (AT) news21 (DOT) on.aibn.com... In article <1b0b566c.0407141656.2568b3c8 (AT) posting (DOT) google.com>, michael (AT) preece (DOT) net says... Assume someone from a purely RDBMS background wants to learn Pick. The "problem" I run into with these people is that it is hard to get them to stop thinking in terms of how they would accomplish the same task in a RDBMS. An analogy would be to learning a foreign language (spoken). Many people make the mistake of trying to translate (in their head) everything they're hearing, back into their native language. Not only is this too slow for them to keep up, but it hinders their progress. I'm not saying the RDBM person should forget everything they know, just try not to keep thinking how they would do it in RDBMS. I remember that I was not overly impressed with Pick when I first started using it (mid 80's). It takes a little time working on real- world projects before one starts to realize the niceties of the data model. The one thing that most RDBMS people will probably cringe about is having to maintain data integrity at the application level. Lack of "modern" admin and dev tools can also put them off. -- Kevin Powick |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
It might be considered a bit rude to respond to a legitimate question by refering to "these people". |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
Assume someone from a purely RDBMS background wants to learn Pick. Let's say they've downloaded and installed UniVerse. What advice would you give them to help them get started so that they can quickly gain an appreciation as to why we like the MV/Pick model so much? Assume they are highly intelligent and very knowledgeable about relational theory. Mike. |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
Kevin, It might be considered a bit rude to respond to a legitimate question by refering to "these people". This isn't comp db theory after all. Check out www.jes.com for documentation and Pick Basic, the basic language of Pick and Pick-like databases. Do a search on "Malcolm Bull" and find his on-line encyclopedia. Mark Brown "Kevin Powick" <nospam (AT) nomail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:MPG.1b5fc40161d2f9b898982a (AT) news21 (DOT) on.aibn.com... In article <1b0b566c.0407141656.2568b3c8 (AT) posting (DOT) google.com>, michael (AT) preece (DOT) net says... Assume someone from a purely RDBMS background wants to learn Pick. The "problem" I run into with these people is that it is hard to get them to stop thinking in terms of how they would accomplish the same task in a RDBMS. An analogy would be to learning a foreign language (spoken). Many people make the mistake of trying to translate (in their head) everything they're hearing, back into their native language. Not only is this too slow for them to keep up, but it hinders their progress. I'm not saying the RDBM person should forget everything they know, just try not to keep thinking how they would do it in RDBMS. I remember that I was not overly impressed with Pick when I first started using it (mid 80's). It takes a little time working on real- world projects before one starts to realize the niceties of the data model. The one thing that most RDBMS people will probably cringe about is having to maintain data integrity at the application level. Lack of "modern" admin and dev tools can also put them off. -- Kevin Powick |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
Assume someone from a purely RDBMS background wants to learn Pick. Let's say they've downloaded and installed UniVerse. What advice would you give them to help them get started so that they can quickly gain an appreciation as to why we like the MV/Pick model so much? Assume they are highly intelligent and very knowledgeable about relational theory. Mike. |
|
Let's say they've downloaded and installed UniVerse.. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |