![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
| |||
| |||
|
|
$OPTIONS INFORMATION ... DUMMY = @(0,0) HEADING HEADER |
#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
Peter wrote: $OPTIONS INFORMATION ... DUMMY = @(0,0) HEADING HEADER That's interesting information (pun sort of intended I guess) but I have to believe you're capitalizing on a bug which may be fixed in some upcoming release. I see great pains for some other site that may find things working differently the next time they upgrade. Can someone explain to me why an obscure reference to @(0,0) would be defined as providing the functionality described? If it's not defined (and I didn't crack the friendly manual on this one) then while you're enjoying the benefits of the bug I recommend you contact IBM to get a better solution and/or ensure that they fix (or perhaps _don't_ fix) this situation for you and others. Another side effect of using a work-around like this is that some other developer at some site is going to see that code, say "this doesn't belong here!", remove it, and then things will break. With one-off changes like that it's very easy for the change to not be documented, and for someone to forget this one line of code they removed because they were so smart. So thanks for the tip but I think someone needs to take this one a little further. |
#13
| |||
| |||
|
|
Another side effect of using a work-around like this is that some other developer at some site is going to see that code, say "this doesn't belong here!", remove it, and then things will break. With one-off changes like that it's very easy for the change to not be documented, and for someone to forget this one line of code they removed because they were so smart. |
#14
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hello Tony, Very true. But a seassoned programmer you would know to add comments. Here is my comment in the program. Can't get any clearer that that. DUMMY = @(0,0) ;* To prevent "Press any key to continue..." BTW Speaking of seassoned programers. This is my 20th year programming in Pick. It's been a long ride and I don't see it comming to an end. I have see the good, the bad and ugly in both programmers and companies. I love this stuff and I'm getting paid for it. Life is good.... Pete Another side effect of using a work-around like this is that some other developer at some site is going to see that code, say "this doesn't belong here!", remove it, and then things will break. With one-off changes like that it's very easy for the change to not be documented, and for someone to forget this one line of code they removed because they were so smart. |
#15
| |||
| |||
|
|
You're getting PAID for it? mdsi2000 wrote: I love this stuff and I'm getting paid for it. Life is good.... |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |