![]() | |
#51
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 2011-07-20 22:26:32 -0400, Kevin Powick <nos... (AT) spamless (DOT) com> said: On 2011-07-20 19:00:31 -0400, Excalibur21 <pgmcmur... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> said: Perhaps you can demonstrate where using dynamic large arrays is faster than dimensioned. I already have. *Look through this thread. Note that Google Groups still seems to be delayed on getting all CDP posts. *It also seems that in some instances posts are missing altogether. * I use a NNTP server, not Google. Actually, a review of the thread shows that you already replied directly to a post where I provided a code sample that demonstrated a large dynamic array outperforming a dimensioned one. I don't really want to keep going on about this. *The facts are in and there's nothing left to prove. *I'm really glad that Kevin King made us all look into this further. Once again, all I'm saying is that the programming task at hand should dictate the coding technique chosen to ensure optimal performance. -- Kevin Powick |
#52
| |||
| |||
|
|
Would you mind telling me which NNTP server you use |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |