![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
F;D;6;];*;26 6> of @record is unit of measure .. 26> of @record is last_labr (decimal) from pick LIST IM 6 26 ER 02803 EA 0.208350 208350 06767 EA 07758 GM 0.950000 950000 01812 EA 0.004000 4000 05776 GM 0.012125 12125 08749 EA 0.092060 92060 my guess is this is a BAD dict item .. but if anyone knows please let me know thanks |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
This makes no sense. If I read this right, it is (( DATE() >= UnitofMeasure ) * undefined)...throw it away, and show attr 26. Sure you transcribed it right? The listing is correct as the F computes! Please describe what you're trying to compute. Also, why use don't you use Algebraic notation instead of F? |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Shame on you telling someone to use algebraic, F-correls are so much more FUN ;-) Jeremy Thomson |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
Ahhh... ] means >= I've been trying to figure out why that ] character is digested by the f-correl & now I know, Thanks Chandru. As for David's conversion perhaps it a dictionary thats been copied from another file accidently? I've had many of those. If Attr 6 was a date and the order was changed thus... F;D;6;];26;* It would make sense comparing a date with today, if greater or equal it would return the value of attr 26 otherwise it would return 0. Shame on you telling someone to use algebraic, F-correls are so much more FUN ;-) Jeremy Thomson |
? Send message to Kofi?|
Chandru Murthi wrote: This makes no sense. If I read this right, it is (( DATE() >= UnitofMeasure ) * undefined)...throw it away, and show attr 26. Sure you transcribed it right? The listing is correct as the F computes! Please describe what you're trying to compute. Also, why use don't you use Algebraic notation instead of F? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |