![]() | |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I have placed a trigger on the dict and data portions of a file as we want to know of any changes dict or data. It appears to work correct with the one exception that it does not get triggered when object is changed. Has anyone seen this? thanks |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
I have placed a trigger on the dict and data portions of a file as we want to know of any changes dict or data. It appears to work correct with the one exception that it does not get triggered when object is changed. Has anyone seen this? thanks |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
I have placed a trigger on the dict and data portions of a file as we want to know of any changes dict or data. It appears to work correct with the one exception that it does not get triggered when object is changed. Has anyone seen this? thanks |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
That might be because the "object" code is NOT in the dictionary, the pointer to the object code is. Mark Brown "dtsig" <dtsig (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:1168555695.208770.288860 (AT) i39g2000hsf (DOT) googlegroups.com... I have placed a trigger on the dict and data portions of a file as we want to know of any changes dict or data. It appears to work correct with the one exception that it does not get triggered when object is changed. Has anyone seen this? thanks |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
I am guessing that you are being facetious when you say "appears to be working correctly with the one exception..." 1. Are you using unix or nt? 2. I use callx triggers a lot (my experience is with D3/linux only) to track changes to records. Here is the top of my standard callx subroutine: sub save.changes(new.rec) if access(12) then new.rec = "" ;* delete if access(16) then return ;* new id = access(10) fv = access(1) read old.rec from fv,id else return if old.rec eq new.rec then return /Scott Ballinger Pareto Corporation Edmonds WA USA 206 713 6006 dtsig wrote: I have placed a trigger on the dict and data portions of a file as we want to know of any changes dict or data. It appears to work correct with the one exception that it does not get triggered when object is changed. Has anyone seen this? thanks |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
Dave: I suspect you need to modify the "compile" or "basic" verb to resolve this. Bill "dtsig" <dtsig (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:1168555695.208770.288860 (AT) i39g2000hsf (DOT) googlegroups.com... I have placed a trigger on the dict and data portions of a file as we want to know of any changes dict or data. It appears to work correct with the one exception that it does not get triggered when object is changed. Has anyone seen this? thanks |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
Mark Brown wrote: That might be because the "object" code is NOT in the dictionary, the pointer to the object code is. Mark Brown "dtsig" <dtsig (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:1168555695.208770.288860 (AT) i39g2000hsf (DOT) googlegroups.com... I have placed a trigger on the dict and data portions of a file as we want to know of any changes dict or data. It appears to work correct with the one exception that it does not get triggered when object is changed. Has anyone seen this? thanks That would do it. Is there a way to 'trigger' on any change to object? thanks |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |