![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
| |||
| |||
|
|
Excalibur wrote: If QuickBooks incorporated a more robust database, its price would increase. Not necessarily. They could use one of several embedded databases that wouldn't cost them very much, if nothing at all. Firebird comes to mind as one example. It certainly is a full-featured (record locking, transactions, etc) database. -- Kevin Powick |
#42
| |||
| |||
|
|
If this Firebird thing is any good it makes one wonder why Quickbooks have not done it already. |
|
Open Source is something I would not touch with a bargepole unless the buyer was willing to sign a contract accepting all liability for its effectiveness. |
#43
| |||
| |||
|
|
During one of the many management changes of my youth, a new MIS director referred to our accounting/payroll system as being written in an old obsolete language (RPL). Our programmer replied, "And yet it still works!" There's a box somewhere in an Atlanta. I'm sure people are still looking up historical (1990's) data on it because they had so much trouble porting it to Oracle. But I've been wrong before. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |