![]() | |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Just been messing about with some AJAX stuf. I was reminded of the FlashConnect demo with the hidden frame for non-flickering page updates. Yet again the pick guys get there serveral years before everyone else. (Actually, I think the concept has been about for ages but Tony's demos were the first time I bumped into it.) Been away for a while in J2EE/SQL land but I still lurk from time to time. Hope all are well. Dave P. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
davpat00 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com wrote: Just been messing about with some AJAX stuf. I was reminded of the FlashConnect demo with the hidden frame for non-flickering page updates. Yet again the pick guys get there serveral years before everyone else. (Actually, I think the concept has been about for ages but Tony's demos were the first time I bumped into it.) Been away for a while in J2EE/SQL land but I still lurk from time to time. Hope all are well. Dave P. Hi Dave, good seeing you again. Thanks for the nod. (Gab mode activated) With a semi-gloat I'm happy to say that when I came up with that hidden frame technique I could find no other reference to the concept on the net, even in "state of the art" magazines of the day. It was an original invention, but it was also simply time for that technique to make its debut, as a lot of non-MV web developers needed that sort of functionality. Not long after I did the WUC2000 presentation we started seeing it get wider use in the general web development industry - no cause/effect relationship implied, again, it was simply time for many people to develop the same technique. Two things bother me about those demos. First, I tried to encourage PS/RD to publish and advertise the technology as "Pick innovation". While it had nothing to do with Pick, it was nevertheless a marketing opportunity to draw attention to our market as a worthy back-end for common web development. Needless to say no one there "got it", so once again we missed a great FREE mainstream opportunity to look like industry leaders. Second, to this day, most Pick people still have no idea about how the hidden frame technique works even though it's a great solution for many common web issues and over 5 years later it's in common use elsewhere. But more than that, the WUC2000 demos showed that FlashCONNECT is a stable and supported "universal pipe" which can be used between D3 and any technology that supports HTTP calls - including other MV environments! I have FC running high-volume transactions in a system-to-system environment (no browser or other UI) for one of my clients, and I just wrote a PHP interface to D3 using FC for another client. After all of this time, there are hardly any VARs doing this, and RD itself doesn't even promote using the tool in this manner. (You'll note that FC isn't even listed as a "Connectivity" product on their products page. Putting DUH! in caps isn't expressive enough. For another round of DUH! note also that the FC web pages don't even link to the demos. Sure they're five years old but the techniques they describe are as current today as they were then, and those pages should be used for product marketing.) For the do-it-yourselfer, this solution is very inexpensive while being one of the best connectivity methods available for D3. Anyway, if you haven't seen them, check out this link: http://flashconnect.rainingdata.com/wuc2000/index.html And click on The Demos link for the aforementioned demos. See the Overview and Requirements and Setup which is required for a couple demos. Regards, Tony TG@ removethisNebula-RnD .com |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
They seem to be pushing TigerLogic quite hard at the moment. RD ran a session at JavaOne promoting their SOA repository. That's quite a big public platform. (It got a mention on theserverside.com and I've seen it pop up in a couple of blogs.) Don't know if it's any good but it definitely puts them ahead in the jargon stakes compared with Cache, JBase, U2 etc. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |