![]() | |
#21
| |||
| |||
|
|
For the time being I'm sticking my head into the sand and hoping for someone to discover a solution.... |
#22
| |||
| |||
|
|
I didn't mean to lie to them. If you tell them it is another version of Paradox that works better with Vista, it is not a lie. If they ask if it is an older version, then tell them it is an older version and the newer version has no real advantage over the older one which is the truth. |
#23
| |||
| |||
|
|
My comment to a customer who wanted to know whether to upgrade to Vista was "how much money do you have?" No more problems for another year or 2. |
#24
| |||
| |||
|
| I didn't mean to lie to them. If you tell them it is another version of Paradox that works better with Vista, it is not a lie. If they ask if it is an older version, then tell them it is an older version and the newer version has no real advantage over the older one which is the truth. I think "upgrading" to an older version would be such an unusual thing to do, so doing it without explaining exactly why and how wouldn't be right, even if the customer doesn't really ask any specific question. You are of course right about the facts but if *I* was the customer I would be very suspicious if someone told me I had to use an older version to run my app on a never OS! Hopefully the customer is pragmatic and think "what ever get's the job done" but more likely he will think "That's what to be expected when using this obscure software called Paradox, better switch to Microsoft before it's too late.", right or wrong, but quite understandable. Anders |
#25
| |||
| |||
|
|
Anders Can you post the exact error logged in the Vista event log (or error log)? -- Bertil Isberg - CTECH Paradox buglist: online: http://hem.bredband.net/bertilisberg/ "Anders Jonsson" <gt3TakeThisAway (AT) bredband (DOT) net> skrev i meddelandet news:4632dae0$1 (AT) pnews (DOT) thedbcommunity.com... Serious question. What is there in P10 (or 11) that makes it that much more desirable than 9? Stability? The new printing methodology? Why not run 9 on Vista? That might be the only solution left. I have never used P9 before (P7 and P8) and it would certainly feel odd to "downgrade" from P10 but as you say, it might be the only solution. The task of installing p9 instead/parallel with P10 for all my clients isn't something I'm looking forward to. What should I tell my clients? "You know Vista is here, we need to run an older version of Paradox!" If I were the client it would make me very worried about the future of the app... I also need to change my printing code which is a minor task but still some work to be done. Luckily I'm not using string lists.... For the time being I'm sticking my head into the sand and hoping for someone to discover a solution.... Anders |
#26
| |||
| |||
|
|
Anders Can you post the exact error logged in the Vista event log (or error log)? -- Bertil Isberg - CTECH Paradox buglist: online: http://hem.bredband.net/bertilisberg/ "Anders Jonsson" <gt3TakeThisAway (AT) bredband (DOT) net> skrev i meddelandet news:4632dae0$1 (AT) pnews (DOT) thedbcommunity.com... Serious question. What is there in P10 (or 11) that makes it that much more desirable than 9? Stability? The new printing methodology? Why not run 9 on Vista? That might be the only solution left. I have never used P9 before (P7 and P8) and it would certainly feel odd to "downgrade" from P10 but as you say, it might be the only solution. The task of installing p9 instead/parallel with P10 for all my clients isn't something I'm looking forward to. What should I tell my clients? "You know Vista is here, we need to run an older version of Paradox!" If I were the client it would make me very worried about the future of the app... I also need to change my printing code which is a minor task but still some work to be done. Luckily I'm not using string lists.... For the time being I'm sticking my head into the sand and hoping for someone to discover a solution.... Anders |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |