![]() | |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Since you are asking on a Paradox forum, I can answer that Paradox would be appropriate for "this type of thing". |
|
I'd imagine that Delphi would, also. |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Who's pretending to market Paradox nowadays? Anyone? Last time I looked, Corel's site made no mention of it. |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
Who's pretending to market Paradox nowadays? Anyone? Last time I looked, Corel's site made no mention of it. |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 19:17:37 GMT, Doug Kanter wrote: Who's pretending to market Paradox nowadays? Anyone? Last time I looked, Corel's site made no mention of it. Hi Doug, Corel recently started advertising Paradox on their site. Here's the link: http://tinyurl.com/a9l5o Check www.thedbcommunity.com, if you haven't already. There's a whole section of articles on serving Paradox tables to the web. Also while you are there, check the archives for threads discussing content management programs -- the programs used to convert user-generated content into mature web pages. This is no wheel you want to reinvent. I wrote my own content management program in Paradox, but my needs are simple. I thought -- almost certainly wrongly -- that the open source content management systems would be so much overkill that rolling my own would be easier. For what it's worth, I store content in Paradox tables, edit it on Paradox forms, textstream it into web pages, and have CuteFTP automatically upload it within a few seconds of its completion. Works fine: www.harganonline.com . The problem I had was inline HTML, such as b>bold</b>. Tony posted a way of handling this a year or so ago, by burying a web browser into a form. You can then set up the browser for WYSIWYG rich content editing; both Explorer and Firefox support this. Thought I'd just cover the major bases here. Sorry if I am saying stuff you already know! |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Doug Kanter" <ancientangler (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote: Who's pretending to market Paradox nowadays? Anyone? Last time I looked, Corel's site made no mention of it. If you have no interest in PDX, take your question to the appropriate technology forum. Asking for feedback and subsequently crafting criticism of that feedback is disingenuous and disrespectful to those responders whose time is wasted. Rick Kelly |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
Who's pretending to market Paradox nowadays? Anyone? Last time I looked, Corel's site made no mention of it. |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
Corel recently started advertising Paradox on their site. Here's the link: |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
Jim Hargan wrote: Corel recently started advertising Paradox on their site. Here's the link: gimme a break.. that link just points to the "Suite 12 Professional" page, which merely happens to say "and Paradox for relational databases".. click to the "features and details" page and it still doesn't say a word about Paradox.. The only difference between WP and WP-Pro is that WP-Pro has Paradox, |
|
please don't give Corel credit for something they don't deserve.. because they really *don't* deserve it.. They are new and improved. Still not very good. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |