![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Anyone got any ideas on fixing this? |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
I am running Paradox 9 under Vista and to date I have found only this one issue. I use a lot of table lookups. I can do the Cntl space and select the item I want, but when I select the item, I get a windows pop up that says the app has stopped responding. |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Anyone got any ideas on fixing this? Not exactly a fix, per se, but... Roll your own lookup form; discussed often here, but not specifically in relation to Vista. Then you can trap your lookup key combination, and present your own lookup with whatever functionality you wish. (Even automagically add the ".." and "@" to the lookup if you wish.) |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
For the past 5 years I've been entering data using Pdx9. My data is almost ready to be publish but I need a little help here. I want to accompany it with an application where users can do intelligent searches in the database. The information includes wildlife species and I users to be able to enter a criteria (10 total) where an undelying table updates according to the entries made. For example, a person saw a bird and only got to see the color of its legs, bill and eyes. How do I make a form where a person enters the color of eyes he/she saw and the table is filtered for only those species that have black eyes, for example. Then when the same user enters the color of its legs, the table updates to only those species that have black eyes and yellow legs, if that is the color entered. Again, when the person enters the color of its bill, it only sees in the table the species that meet all the three criteria. I was working with variables for the field and using queries to display the result on the canDepart method but everytime I run a query and use the table, it erases the index keys, actually, no record is erased it just doesn't have the index keys anymore. The result is a non indexed answer table. If any of you can help me and direct me in the right direction, I think I can do this. Thanks! |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
The user may not have paradox. |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
The user may not have paradox. |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
That didn't help, it prefills the field... I want users to enter a value and use that value to filter the underlying table, is like selecting Filter and entering the names but within the form. The user may not have paradox. iy "Dennis Santoro" <RDAPres (AT) NoRDASpamWorldWide (DOT) com> wrote in message news:470c097e$1 (AT) pnews (DOT) thedbcommunity.com... Take a look at the typeahead example on our paradox resources page (link in my signature). That should get you started. You can add multiple fields using the model there or you can add a field with radio buttons so they can toggle one field from filter to filter. Denn Santoro President Resource Development Associates http://www.RDAWorldWide.Com Offices in the United States and Germany Providing solutions to health care, business, governments and non-profits since 1982 Inabón Yunes wrote: For the past 5 years I've been entering data using Pdx9. My data is almost ready to be publish but I need a little help here. I want to accompany it with an application where users can do intelligent searches in the database. The information includes wildlife species and I users to be able to enter a criteria (10 total) where an undelying table updates according to the entries made. For example, a person saw a bird and only got to see the color of its legs, bill and eyes. How do I make a form where a person enters the color of eyes he/she saw and the table is filtered for only those species that have black eyes, for example. Then when the same user enters the color of its legs, the table updates to only those species that have black eyes and yellow legs, if that is the color entered. Again, when the person enters the color of its bill, it only sees in the table the species that meet all the three criteria. I was working with variables for the field and using queries to display the result on the canDepart method but everytime I run a query and use the table, it erases the index keys, actually, no record is erased it just doesn't have the index keys anymore. The result is a non indexed answer table. If any of you can help me and direct me in the right direction, I think I can do this. Thanks! |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
It takes a fair amount of programming skill, though. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |