dbTalk Databases Forums  

table API

comp.databases.oracle comp.databases.oracle


Discuss table API in the comp.databases.oracle forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
bdj
 
Posts: n/a

Default table API - 12-14-2004 , 01:20 PM






Hello!
With Designer (and other tools) you can generate table-API's.

When is a good idea to use it? I assume that it only make sense when have to
modify an single row by an
Forms/Report or other end-user-application (for example web-interfaces) -
right?

Where to read more about it?

Greetings
Bjørn



Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
Mark C. Stock
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: table API - 12-15-2004 , 05:30 AM







"bdj" <B.D.Jensen (AT) gmx (DOT) net> wrote

Quote:
Hello!
With Designer (and other tools) you can generate table-API's.

When is a good idea to use it? I assume that it only make sense when have
to
modify an single row by an
Forms/Report or other end-user-application (for example web-interfaces) -
right?

Where to read more about it?

Greetings
Bjørn


i've come to be quite an advocate of TAPI's the more applications i've had
to maintain

TAPI's generated by tools are of course very rudimentary -- but as you fold
in appropriate business rules, having a single procedure that maintains a
table greatly simplifies maintenance and development -- and debugging. on
many projects that i've been called in on to support/maintain/enhance i've
had to spend most of my time searching code to find out what procedures are
accessing a certain table. if it's all in a single package, you've got a
nice clean structure to work with.

++ mcs




Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old   
bdj
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: table API - 12-15-2004 , 02:04 PM



Hi!
But what about performance when you have to manipulate more than one row
quickly?
Greetings
Bjørn
"Mark C. Stock" <mcstockX@Xenquery .com> skrev i en meddelelse
news:apOdnWPwarUfvV3cRVn-rg (AT) comcast (DOT) com...
Quote:
"bdj" <B.D.Jensen (AT) gmx (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:41bf3ce8$0$281$edfadb0f (AT) dread11 (DOT) news.tele.dk...
| Hello!
| With Designer (and other tools) you can generate table-API's.
|
| When is a good idea to use it? I assume that it only make sense when
have
to
| modify an single row by an
| Forms/Report or other end-user-application (for example
web-interfaces) -
| right?
|
| Where to read more about it?
|
| Greetings
| Bjørn
|
|

i've come to be quite an advocate of TAPI's the more applications i've had
to maintain

TAPI's generated by tools are of course very rudimentary -- but as you
fold
in appropriate business rules, having a single procedure that maintains a
table greatly simplifies maintenance and development -- and debugging. on
many projects that i've been called in on to support/maintain/enhance i've
had to spend most of my time searching code to find out what procedures
are
accessing a certain table. if it's all in a single package, you've got a
nice clean structure to work with.

++ mcs





Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old   
Mark C. Stock
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: table API - 12-15-2004 , 05:02 PM




"bdj" <B.D.Jensen (AT) gmx (DOT) net> wrote

Quote:
Hi!
But what about performance when you have to manipulate more than one row
quickly?
Greetings
Bjørn
"Mark C. Stock" <mcstockX@Xenquery .com> skrev i en meddelelse
news:apOdnWPwarUfvV3cRVn-rg (AT) comcast (DOT) com...

"bdj" <B.D.Jensen (AT) gmx (DOT) net> wrote in message
news:41bf3ce8$0$281$edfadb0f (AT) dread11 (DOT) news.tele.dk...
| Hello!
| With Designer (and other tools) you can generate table-API's.
|
| When is a good idea to use it? I assume that it only make sense when
have
to
| modify an single row by an
| Forms/Report or other end-user-application (for example
web-interfaces) -
| right?
|
| Where to read more about it?
|
| Greetings
| Bjørn
|
|

i've come to be quite an advocate of TAPI's the more applications i've
had
to maintain

TAPI's generated by tools are of course very rudimentary -- but as you
fold
in appropriate business rules, having a single procedure that maintains
a
table greatly simplifies maintenance and development -- and debugging.
on
many projects that i've been called in on to support/maintain/enhance
i've
had to spend most of my time searching code to find out what procedures
are
accessing a certain table. if it's all in a single package, you've got a
nice clean structure to work with.

++ mcs




not an issue -- you just write the appropriate procedure/function that
manipulates the appropriate rows

++ mcs




Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.