![]() | |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hello! With Designer (and other tools) you can generate table-API's. When is a good idea to use it? I assume that it only make sense when have to modify an single row by an Forms/Report or other end-user-application (for example web-interfaces) - right? Where to read more about it? Greetings Bjørn |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
"bdj" <B.D.Jensen (AT) gmx (DOT) net> wrote in message news:41bf3ce8$0$281$edfadb0f (AT) dread11 (DOT) news.tele.dk... | Hello! | With Designer (and other tools) you can generate table-API's. | | When is a good idea to use it? I assume that it only make sense when have to | modify an single row by an | Forms/Report or other end-user-application (for example web-interfaces) - | right? | | Where to read more about it? | | Greetings | Bjørn | | i've come to be quite an advocate of TAPI's the more applications i've had to maintain TAPI's generated by tools are of course very rudimentary -- but as you fold in appropriate business rules, having a single procedure that maintains a table greatly simplifies maintenance and development -- and debugging. on many projects that i've been called in on to support/maintain/enhance i've had to spend most of my time searching code to find out what procedures are accessing a certain table. if it's all in a single package, you've got a nice clean structure to work with. ++ mcs |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi! But what about performance when you have to manipulate more than one row quickly? Greetings Bjørn "Mark C. Stock" <mcstockX@Xenquery .com> skrev i en meddelelse news:apOdnWPwarUfvV3cRVn-rg (AT) comcast (DOT) com... "bdj" <B.D.Jensen (AT) gmx (DOT) net> wrote in message news:41bf3ce8$0$281$edfadb0f (AT) dread11 (DOT) news.tele.dk... | Hello! | With Designer (and other tools) you can generate table-API's. | | When is a good idea to use it? I assume that it only make sense when have to | modify an single row by an | Forms/Report or other end-user-application (for example web-interfaces) - | right? | | Where to read more about it? | | Greetings | Bjørn | | i've come to be quite an advocate of TAPI's the more applications i've had to maintain TAPI's generated by tools are of course very rudimentary -- but as you fold in appropriate business rules, having a single procedure that maintains a table greatly simplifies maintenance and development -- and debugging. on many projects that i've been called in on to support/maintain/enhance i've had to spend most of my time searching code to find out what procedures are accessing a certain table. if it's all in a single package, you've got a nice clean structure to work with. ++ mcs |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |