![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
We are about to plan our next database server. (Linux RH 3, Oracle 10.2.0.1.0) It's got 6 discs, so it's a pretty small system and we have tentatively decided to go with oracles S.A.M.E. approach, namely as much mirroring as necessary and as much striping as possible. And put the slowest data (probably OS and archived logs) on the inside and the performance critical data on the outside of the discs. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Mon, 3 Apr 2006 16:05:17 +0200, Volker Hetzer wrote (in article <e0ra2t$tc0$1 (AT) nntp (DOT) fujitsu-siemens.com>): We are about to plan our next database server. (Linux RH 3, Oracle 10.2.0.1.0) It's got 6 discs, so it's a pretty small system and we have tentatively decided to go with oracles S.A.M.E. approach, namely as much mirroring as necessary and as much striping as possible. And put the slowest data (probably OS and archived logs) on the inside and the performance critical data on the outside of the discs. Volker, for the storage I would go for ASM. Have you considered this ? It really is worth taking a good look. Yes, I did. However, from what I gathered this setup requires a second |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Mon, 3 Apr 2006 16:05:17 +0200, Volker Hetzer wrote (in article <e0ra2t$tc0$1 (AT) nntp (DOT) fujitsu-siemens.com>): We are about to plan our next database server. (Linux RH 3, Oracle 10.2.0.1.0) It's got 6 discs, so it's a pretty small system and we have tentatively decided to go with oracles S.A.M.E. approach, namely as much mirroring as necessary and as much striping as possible. And put the slowest data (probably OS and archived logs) on the inside and the performance critical data on the outside of the discs. Volker, for the storage I would go for ASM. Have you considered this ? It really is worth taking a good look. Hi! |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |