dbTalk Databases Forums  

Re: So.....

comp.databases.oracle.server comp.databases.oracle.server


Discuss Re: So..... in the comp.databases.oracle.server forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old   
joel garry
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: So..... - 01-20-2012 , 06:41 PM






On Jan 20, 12:39*pm, ddf <orat... (AT) msn (DOT) com> wrote:
Quote:
On Jan 19, 2:33*pm, Noons <wizofo... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:
...> When it comes to Windows, there is one horse: ES. The rest is
powerpoint territory.
And while for a long time I discounted MSSQL as just an oddity, quite
frankly nowadays I find it not only quite usable but also a good piece
of software.

...

Having never configured any database on Windows Enterprise Server I'll
need to take your word for it. *It's good to know that Winders isn't
the raging mess I'm used to seeing (from Desktop to 2008 Server) and
that there is one reliable version of the operating system available.

Why can't Micro$oft do the right thing and make more of the
commercially available Windows offerings as reliable as ES is reported
to be?

David Fitzjarrell
That would, ironically, break everything already out there.

jg
--
@home.com is bogus.
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2012/...-biotech-exec/

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old   
Noons
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: So..... - 01-21-2012 , 04:02 AM






joel garry wrote,on my timestamp of 21/01/2012 11:41 AM:

Quote:
Having never configured any database on Windows Enterprise Server I'll
need to take your word for it. It's good to know that Winders isn't
the raging mess I'm used to seeing (from Desktop to 2008 Server) and
that there is one reliable version of the operating system available.

Why can't Micro$oft do the right thing and make more of the
commercially available Windows offerings as reliable as ES is reported
to be?

David Fitzjarrell

That would, ironically, break everything already out there.
LOL!
True.

Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old   
Noons
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: So..... - 01-22-2012 , 04:22 PM



On Jan 20, 11:50*pm, Hans Henrik Krohn <hhkr... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:


Quote:
Hello, I *think* I have managed to find the relevant information from
MOS. You have to find MOS article 282036.1, download the attached .pdf
file 282036_Final.pdf, and then read page 20.

QUOTE:
IBM Software Requirements and PTFs for AIX 5.3 support of Oracle
Database 11g Release 2 (11.2.0.1 or higher)

The requirements for the software products certified on Oracle
Database 11gR2 with AIX 5.3 are described in this section. AIX 5.3 is
certified on Oracle Database 11gR2 using AIX 5.3 TL10 SP1 or higher.
The 64 bit kernel is required for all Oracle Database 11gR2
installations.
ETOUQ

Thanks, but not quite what I had in mind.
It is a generic document, with somewhat dated information (early
2011).
Doc ID 1307544.1 mentions it as well and seems to be more up to date:
last update is from Jan 2012.
But none addresses the fundamental problem here: OUI checks for RAC
install and its related packages and stops installs where RAC was
never selected.
That's what needs to be fixed. Among a great many other things...

Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.