dbTalk Databases Forums  

Re: Arrghh!!

comp.databases.oracle.server comp.databases.oracle.server


Discuss Re: Arrghh!! in the comp.databases.oracle.server forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
Niall Litchfield
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Arrghh!! - 06-24-2003 , 04:04 PM






"Billy Verreynne" <vslabs (AT) onwe (DOT) co.za> wrote

Quote:
Fix one problem and then you run smack into another one.

Oracle 8.1.7.4 (32bit) on HP-UX B11.

Been getting this:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [711], [1], [1074596568],
[kdiulk
- prefix context], [], [], [], []

Traced it to a potential problem with compressed indexes. Rebuild indexes
without compression. This error disappears...

...only to be replace with this shortly after:
ORA-600 [25012]

Metalink reports this as an index problem (bugs 1228658, 1138239, 1312233,
1297674, etc) - but all fixed with 8.1.6.2 latest.

I know that this should be TAR'ed.. but I'm pushing for a 9i upgrade on
all
our platforms anyway. And we're likely to see that before we see this
problem patched (given that 8.1 is being desupported end of this year).

In the meantime I have production jobs that fail. Ones that never have
failed before with an ORA-00600. The instance itself is unchanged. Been
patched to 8.1.7.4 last year - no other changes (except dealing with
larger
volumes of data than before).

Bigger indexes on bigger tables, and using compression btw, on the _same_
instance work fine. Not a single ORA-00600 except for two specific tables
on that instance.

I'd look at Note 100073.1 which I found through the ora-0600 lookup Utility
which metalink supplies if you try to log an 0600 tar - It is *sometimes*
pretty useful this.
I'd hazard a guess that the root cause of the compression problems is
related to this and not to compression per se.

cheers (er.. i think)

--
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
Audit Commission UK
*****************************************
Please include version and platform
and SQL where applicable
It makes life easier and increases the
likelihood of a good answer
******************************************




Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
Billy Verreynne
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Arrghh!! - 06-25-2003 , 08:13 AM






Niall Litchfield wrote:

Quote:
I'd look at Note 100073.1 which I found through the ora-0600 lookup
Utility which metalink supplies if you try to log an 0600 tar - It is
*sometimes* pretty useful this.
Excellent stuff. Thanks Niall. That's a reall little gem. It tells me
_exactly_ what is happening.

Quote:
cheers (er.. i think)
Cheers! (downing yet another cup of coffee)

--
Billy


Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.