dbTalk Databases Forums  

Oracle RAC vs VM WARE

comp.databases.oracle.server comp.databases.oracle.server


Discuss Oracle RAC vs VM WARE in the comp.databases.oracle.server forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old   
Valentin Minzatu
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Oracle RAC vs VM WARE - 05-13-2007 , 04:14 PM






On May 11, 11:11 pm, EscVector <J... (AT) webthere (DOT) com> wrote:
Quote:
On May 11, 11:47 am, Valentin Minzatu <valentinminz... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com
wrote:





On May 11, 11:42 am, "fitzjarr... (AT) cox (DOT) net" <fitzjarr... (AT) cox (DOT) net
wrote:

On May 11, 10:24 am, sybrandb <sybra... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

On May 11, 5:17 pm, "ame... (AT) iwc (DOT) net" <ame... (AT) iwc (DOT) net> wrote:

Hi All,

I'm not real familiar with either of the two technologies I am posting
about, but, we are setting up 2 new servers to run 5 database
instances.

Currently we have 5 older machines, and they are about to go. We are
trying to decide if it would be better to run VM WARE and have 5
virtual machines between the 2 new machines, with the databases
replicating themselves on the other for failover.

OR

Run Oracle RAC.

From what I understand, RAC will make better use of resources should

one instance need it. But I think we're talking about multiple Oracle
Homes on the same box right?

Can anyone offer some feedback maybe on some of their experiences??

Thanks!

For once, please do some homework prior to posting
For instancehttp://www.orafaq.com/faq/rac

Other than that vmware is to RAC as is apples to pears.
They are two completely different concepts.

--
Sybrand Bakker
Senior Oracle DBA- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I was thinking more like bagels and lox; they aren't the same but they
can go together.

David Fitzjarrell- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Only by running 2/3 instances on a single box you pay a substantial
penalty in terms of CPU, memory and I/O bandwith. Adding a vritual
machine to the mix will only make the whole thing slower. Can you not
consolidate the 5 into 1 and then either replicate to the other
machine or rac them together?

I have no problems running multiple instances or vm on the same
machines. In fact, some vm images run faster than native. It all
depends on how you set it up.

If you have to ask, then stay away from RAC.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
EscVector, I am arguing on the fact that VMs can be tuned to run
faster than the native O/S although I would have to see it (not
intention to flame anybody here).

I doubt though that 3 VMs, each with an Oracle instance running
inside, will perform better than single Oracle instance on the same
hardware.

On the other hand, RAC may or may not be the right choice depending on
the business requirements: RAC gives some flexibility in terms of HA,
but not at the same level with replication (two distinct sites/
databases). Each of the two has pros and cons and making a call one
versus the other without knowing the exact business case is a bit of a
stretch.

Valentin
Valentin



Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old   
hasta_l3@hotmail.com
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Oracle RAC vs VM WARE - 05-14-2007 , 01:46 AM






On 13 mai, 23:14, Valentin Minzatu <valentinminz... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote:
Quote:
On May 11, 11:11 pm, EscVector <J... (AT) webthere (DOT) com> wrote:
I have no problems running multiple instances or vm on the same
machines. In fact, some vm images run faster than native. It all
depends on how you set it up.

If you have to ask, then stay away from RAC

EscVector, I am arguing on the fact that VMs can be tuned to run
faster than the native O/S although I would have to see it (not
intention to flame anybody here).

I doubt though that 3 VMs, each with an Oracle instance running
inside, will perform better than single Oracle instance on the same
hardware.

We have so far three customer running Oracle in a W2003 vm
under WMWare ESQ on Sun/SAN...

We observed that the VM is twice slower than the physical
machine (despite CPU guarantee)

I realize that this is anecdotical data. However, the undisputable
fact is that so far the customers using Oracle under VMWare
on production systems call us a lot for performance problems :-)

--- Raoul



Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old   
hasta_l3@hotmail.com
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Oracle RAC vs VM WARE - 05-14-2007 , 02:00 AM



On 14 mai, 08:46, hasta... (AT) hotmail (DOT) com wrote:
Quote:
On 13 mai, 23:14, Valentin Minzatu <valentinminz... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote:

On May 11, 11:11 pm, EscVector <J... (AT) webthere (DOT) com> wrote:
I have no problems running multiple instances orvmon the same
machines. In fact, somevmimages run faster than native. It all
depends on how you set it up.

If you have to ask, then stay away fromRAC

EscVector, I am arguing on the fact that VMs can be tuned to run
faster than the native O/S although I would have to see it (not
intention to flame anybody here).

I doubt though that 3 VMs, each with an Oraclei nstance running
inside, will perform better than single Oracle instance on the same
hardware.

We have so far three customer runningOraclein a W2003vm
under WMWare ESQ on Sun/SAN...
VMWare ESX... Not yet awaked :-)

Quote:
We observed that the VM is twice slower than the physical
machine (despite CPU guarantee)

I realize that this is anecdotical data. However, the undisputable
fact is that so far the customers usingOracleunder VMWare
on production systems call us a lot for performance problems :-)

--- Raoul



Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old   
Frank van Bortel
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Oracle RAC vs VM WARE - 05-14-2007 , 12:57 PM



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

sybrandb (AT) hccnet (DOT) nl schreef:
Quote:
On 13 May 2007 03:32:10 -0700, ErikYkema <erik.ykema (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

You should probably read what moans nogood has to say about rac and
high availability.
moans nogood - does he have a URL?

Moans Nogood isn't called Moans Nogood as hpuxrac isn't hpuxrac.
His real name is Mogens Norgaard, he is one of the founders of the
Oaktable Network, and he has his own company in Denmark called
MiracleAs.

And a brewery!

- --
Regards,
Frank van Bortel

Top-posting is one way to shut me up...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFGSKL1Lw8L4IAs830RAgacAJ4ivg1w8CZD+FiPk+mwvX SmNG4ZegCfWEF0
E/Wu8FmBwFkQbjzc3mKjJyk=
=tEE+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old   
NetComrade
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Oracle RAC vs VM WARE - 05-24-2007 , 03:07 AM



On 11 May 2007 08:17:22 -0700, "amerar (AT) iwc (DOT) net" <amerar (AT) iwc (DOT) net>
wrote:


Quote:
Currently we have 5 older machines, and they are about to go. We are
trying to decide if it would be better to run VM WARE and have 5
virtual machines between the 2 new machines, with the databases
replicating themselves on the other for failover.

Run your databases under different SIDs under same homes if versions
are the same. Use Veritas Cluster, or the like, if you need 'failover'
(you'll need shared storage too). Save yourself the headache of
dealing VMWare or RAC.

........
We run Oracle 9iR2,10gR1/2 on RH4/RH3 and Solaris 10 (Sparc)
remove NSPAM to email


Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.