dbTalk Databases Forums  

NFS vs RAW for ASM

comp.databases.oracle.server comp.databases.oracle.server


Discuss NFS vs RAW for ASM in the comp.databases.oracle.server forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
orcljsb@gmail.com
 
Posts: n/a

Default NFS vs RAW for ASM - 05-25-2007 , 09:37 AM






Has anyone done any benchmarks to compare performance of ASM using RAW
partitions vs. NFS (especially NFS on Netapp)?

A Netapp 3070 is coming my way in about a month so I can't do any
testing ahead of time but wondering what anyone else could share.


Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
DA Morgan
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: NFS vs RAW for ASM - 05-25-2007 , 09:51 AM






orcljsb (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote:
Quote:
Has anyone done any benchmarks to compare performance of ASM using RAW
partitions vs. NFS (especially NFS on Netapp)?

A Netapp 3070 is coming my way in about a month so I can't do any
testing ahead of time but wondering what anyone else could share.
NFS mount will likely be a bit slower than ASM on RAW but there is more
to the equation than that.

NetApp's NFS has no issues with respect to device persistence.

NetApp's NFS is essentially plug-and-play. Total configuration time
should be an hour or two.

Fewer moving parts.

That said ... which is the better choice depends on what you are going
to do with it.
--
Daniel A. Morgan
University of Washington
damorgan@x.washington.edu
(replace x with u to respond)
Puget Sound Oracle Users Group
www.psoug.org


Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old   
Cristian Cudizio
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: NFS vs RAW for ASM - 05-25-2007 , 09:56 AM



On May 25, 4:51 pm, DA Morgan <damor... (AT) psoug (DOT) org> wrote:
Quote:
orcl... (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote:
Has anyone done any benchmarks to compare performance of ASM using RAW
partitions vs. NFS (especially NFS on Netapp)?

A Netapp 3070 is coming my way in about a month so I can't do any
testing ahead of time but wondering what anyone else could share.

NFS mount will likely be a bit slower than ASM on RAW but there is more
to the equation than that.

NetApp's NFS has no issues with respect to device persistence.

NetApp's NFS is essentially plug-and-play. Total configuration time
should be an hour or two.

Fewer moving parts.

That said ... which is the better choice depends on what you are going
to do with it.
--
Daniel A. Morgan
University of Washington
damor...@x.washington.edu
(replace x with u to respond)
Puget Sound Oracle Users Groupwww.psoug.org
i recomend you to visit http://kevinclosson.wordpress.com/ you will
find there also some link to
documented benchmarks.

Bye
Cristian Cudizio

http://oracledb.wordpress.com
http://cristiancudizio.wordpress.com



Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old   
orcljsb@gmail.com
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: NFS vs RAW for ASM - 05-25-2007 , 09:59 AM



On May 25, 10:51 am, DA Morgan <damor... (AT) psoug (DOT) org> wrote:
Quote:
orcl... (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote:
Has anyone done any benchmarks to compare performance of ASM using RAW
partitions vs. NFS (especially NFS on Netapp)?

A Netapp 3070 is coming my way in about a month so I can't do any
testing ahead of time but wondering what anyone else could share.

NFS mount will likely be a bit slower than ASM on RAW but there is more
to the equation than that.

NetApp's NFS has no issues with respect to device persistence.

NetApp's NFS is essentially plug-and-play. Total configuration time
should be an hour or two.

Fewer moving parts.

That said ... which is the better choice depends on what you are going
to do with it.
I found: http://download-east.oracle.com/docs...htm#sthref1134
- but there is no mention of directio mount options, just wondering
what other options I should use aside from those mentioned in the
Oracle documentation.

Thanks



Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old   
Cristian Cudizio
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: NFS vs RAW for ASM - 05-25-2007 , 10:01 AM



On May 25, 4:59 pm, orcl... (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote:
Quote:
On May 25, 10:51 am, DA Morgan <damor... (AT) psoug (DOT) org> wrote:



orcl... (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote:
Has anyone done any benchmarks to compare performance of ASM using RAW
partitions vs. NFS (especially NFS on Netapp)?

A Netapp 3070 is coming my way in about a month so I can't do any
testing ahead of time but wondering what anyone else could share.

NFS mount will likely be a bit slower than ASM on RAW but there is more
to the equation than that.

NetApp's NFS has no issues with respect to device persistence.

NetApp's NFS is essentially plug-and-play. Total configuration time
should be an hour or two.

Fewer moving parts.

That said ... which is the better choice depends on what you are going
to do with it.

I found: http://download-east.oracle.com/docs...ll.102/b15667/...
- but there is no mention of directio mount options, just wondering
what other options I should use aside from those mentioned in the
Oracle documentation.

Thanks
That is an option to use ASM on a NAS, it is required if you use RAC
standard edition, otherwise it
makes no much sense.

Bye
Cristian Cudizio

http://oracledb.wordpress.com
http://cristiancudizio.wordpress.com



Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old   
orcljsb@gmail.com
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: NFS vs RAW for ASM - 05-25-2007 , 10:15 AM



On May 25, 11:01 am, Cristian Cudizio <cristian.cudi... (AT) yahoo (DOT) it>
wrote:
Quote:
That is an option to use ASM on a NAS, it is required if you use RAC
standard edition, otherwise it
makes no much sense.
thanks - the configuration would be for 10g enterprise edition,
probably 3 node RAC. I'm trying to get an idea how much performance
loss there is using NFS vs. RAW. thanks



Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old   
Cristian Cudizio
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: NFS vs RAW for ASM - 05-25-2007 , 10:35 AM



On 25 Mag, 17:15, orcl... (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote:
Quote:
On May 25, 11:01 am, Cristian Cudizio <cristian.cudi... (AT) yahoo (DOT) it
wrote:

That is an option to use ASM on a NAS, it is required if you use RAC
standard edition, otherwise it
makes no much sense.

thanks - the configuration would be for 10g enterprise edition,
probably 3 node RAC. I'm trying to get an idea how much performance
loss there is using NFS vs. RAW. thanks

From what has already exposed Kevin Closson there is a very little
loss of performance,
se http://kevinclosson.wordpress.com/20...truth-telling/
there are link to interesting documents and Kevin Closson
considerations.

Bye
Cristian Cudizio

http://oracledb.wordpress.com
http://cristiancudizio.wordpress.com




Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old   
Mladen Gogala
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: NFS vs RAW for ASM - 05-25-2007 , 04:25 PM



On Fri, 25 May 2007 07:56:12 -0700, Cristian Cudizio wrote:

Quote:
i recomend you to visit http://kevinclosson.wordpress.com/ you will find
there also some link to
documented benchmarks.
I second that recommendation. Kevin and K.Gopalakrishnan are the guys
with the most profound RAC knowledge of all people I know, with the
possible exception of Scott Heisey, no longer active in the Oracle world.
Scott Heisey and Scott Gosset were the best Oracle instructors that I've
ever known.

--
http://www.mladen-gogala.com


Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.