![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
We use a Windows2000-System with 3 processor. Most busy is one of this three processors. What can I do, to share the resources more symmetrical. Is this only depending of the operating system or can i manipulate the behavior of the system on the oracle-site? Georg Walk |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
We use a Windows2000-System with 3 processor. Most busy is one of this three processors. What can I do, to share the resources more symmetrical. Is this only depending of the operating system or can i manipulate the behavior of the system on the oracle-site? Georg Walk |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
A little bit more information ..... you can do a lot but we need more info. What version oracle, what version Win 2K (server or pro), how much mem, what have you done with the W2K res kit to alleviate the problem. What have you done with Oracle to analyze the problem ? Why is it busy ? "Georg Walk" <Georg.Walk (AT) cai (DOT) de> wrote in message news:3f0c2b99$1_1 (AT) news (DOT) ecore.net... We use a Windows2000-System with 3 processor. Most busy is one of this three processors. What can I do, to share the resources more symmetrical. Is this only depending of the operating system or can i manipulate the behavior of the system on the oracle-site? Georg Walk |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
I am not so familiar with the W2K res kit; so give me a tip what are the first step to evaluate the problem. What is the best way to look on the performance parameters in teh oracle db. I found a lot of V$...-infos. But which should I take first? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |