![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
| |||
| |||
|
|
Thanks Ana. They prefer to not use stored procedures in my environment, but I will look into it. |
|
Any other thoughts about the original approach? Why specifically might your solution be preferable? Thanks again. Dana |
#22
| |||
| |||
|
|
Thanks Ana. They prefer to not use stored procedures in my environment, but I will look into it. |
|
Any other thoughts about the original approach? Why specifically might your solution be preferable? Thanks again. Dana |
#23
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 13 Jun, 13:02, dana... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com wrote: Thanks Ana. They prefer to not use stored procedures in my environment, but I will look into it. Out of interest, why? |
#24
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 13 Jun, 13:02, dana... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com wrote: Thanks Ana. They prefer to not use stored procedures in my environment, but I will look into it. Out of interest, why? |
#25
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 13 Jun, 13:02, dana... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com wrote: Thanks Ana. They prefer to not use stored procedures in my environment, but I will look into it. Out of interest, why? |
#26
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 13 Jun, 13:02, dana... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com wrote: Thanks Ana. They prefer to not use stored procedures in my environment, but I will look into it. Out of interest, why? |
#27
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 13 Jun, 13:02, dana... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com wrote: Thanks Ana. They prefer to not use stored procedures in my environment, but I will look into it. Out of interest, why? |
#28
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 13 Jun, 13:02, dana... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com wrote: Thanks Ana. They prefer to not use stored procedures in my environment, but I will look into it. Out of interest, why? |
#29
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 13 Jun, 13:02, dana... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com wrote: Thanks Ana. They prefer to not use stored procedures in my environment, but I will look into it. Out of interest, why? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |