I did "show parameter recycle" and got the following reply:

SQL> show parameter recycle

NAME TYPE VALUE
------------------------------------ -----------
------------------------------
buffer_pool_recycle string
db_recycle_cache_size big integer 0
recyclebin string on
SQL>

What is surprising is BUFFER_POOL_RECYCLE, a parameter that has been
obsolete since the version 9.2. It wasn't documented in 10g and I don't
understand why was this obvious atavism retained in 11.2? Here is the
link to 9.2 documentation that qualifies this parameter as obsolete:

http://docs.oracle.com/cd/A97630_01/...6536/ch119.htm


This should have been removed altogether or retained as an underscore
parameter. It isn't documented, but it's there.
--
http://mgogala.byethost5.com

On Dec 9, 8:54*pm, Mladen Gogala <gogala.mla... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:
See http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/...htm#UPGRD12570
and MOS Oracle Multiple Buffer Pools Feature [ID 135223.1]

I guess cleaning out the garage isn't high on development priorities.
It must be a pain trying to slowly wean some dinosaurs off their
parameters. Bug 4331420: DBUA FAILS WITH "STRING INDEX OUT OF RANGE:
-8" ERROR is an example that dbua has to be able to handle all kinds
of bizarro version skips.

jg
--
@home.com is bogus.
http://www.businessweek.com/news/201...nder-says.html

On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 11:11:34 -0800, joel garry wrote:

This is an interesting bug.



--
http://mgogala.byethost5.com