![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
|
many slaves replication with a short, but not realtime lag. |
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Interested in practical experience with Oracle replication, esp. when replicating blobs in medium-sized databases. What have you chosen, why, and how happy you are with it. We are running 10.0.2 at this point, and looking rather into 1-master many slaves replication with a short, but not realtime lag. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
We have had good luck with Streams for *LOB types, and also use advanced replication for unsupported datatypes such as XMLTYPE. HTH, Steve |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
We have had good luck with Streams for *LOB types, and also use advanced replication for unsupported datatypes such as XMLTYPE. HTH, Steve |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Nov 6, 12:38 pm, Steve Howard <stevedhow... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote: We have had good luck with Streams for *LOB types, and also use advanced replication for unsupported datatypes such as XMLTYPE. HTH, Steve My understanding is that BLOBs are translated either into varchar or raw datatype for the LCRs. How were you handling BLOBs bigger than 2K in size (or 32K for varchars)? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |