On Tue, 02 May 2006 10:16:56 -0400, Mark C. Stock wrote:
Quote:
I got real excited about SQL Developer when it went beta -- but it still
has a ways to go. |
As did I - and you are right that even prod release 1 has 'opportunities
for improvement' <tm>
Then again ... how long has it been out? and how long has Toad been out?
In that context, I'm impressed. (Just don't drop the ball, Oracle.)
Quote:
It's still a matter of you get what you pay for -- I hope the dev team
follows through on a promising start, but if they can't get basic
day-to-day functionality right pretty soon, SQL-Dev is really starting to
lose its shine for me. |
It depends on what your 'day to day' stuff includes. I very much prefer
SQL*Plus for 99% of the day to day that I do.
I find SQL Developer is an adequate 'hey, look at this' tool, and I have
it on my [*nix] desktop for the few times I want to access it ... mainly
for demos and to inspect [basic] dictionary stuff. Price is right for
that, and it saves firing up some of the alternatives I trend to use.
If, as you say, 'they' continue with dev as promised, it has the markings
of a great tool in the long run. Heck, even I have asked for features
So - right now, it's adequate. And supported at no added charge, under my
current support contract. (Although you may note that I have been
deliberately avoiding contributing to the 'Support sucks' thread. <g>)
All that said, the big advantage of SQLPlus - as a consultant, I like the
'warm fuzzy' of knowing that the tool I need is in any customer's shop.
And that will likely soon extend to SLQ Developer, if Oracle includes it
on their CDs.
--
Hans Forbrich
Canada-wide Oracle training and consulting
mailto: Fuzzy.GreyBeard_at_gmail.com
*** Top posting [replies] guarantees I won't respond. ***