![]() | |
#11
| |||
| |||
|
|
The Magnet wrote: Well, sorry for being like this. *But a CLOB can handle 4GB, right? So, I would think the problem is between PHP and Oracle, maybe something in the communication? Read my lips: Oracle SQL can only handle 4K. |
#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Sep 23, 11:36*am, "Gerard H. Pille" <g... (AT) skynet (DOT) be> wrote: The Magnet wrote: Well, sorry for being like this. *But a CLOB can handle 4GB, right? So, I would think the problem is between PHP and Oracle, maybe something in the communication? Read my lips: Oracle SQL can only handle 4K. 4k? What is the use of CLOB if it can only handle 4k, make it a VARCHAR2? That makes no sense. A stored procedure should be able to receive a CLOB and store it in a CLOB column. Heck, think of the articles on CNN and other sites. Do you think they are only 4k? Most images are greater than 4k also. |
#13
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Sep 23, 11:36 am, "Gerard H. Pille"<g... (AT) skynet (DOT) be> wrote: The Magnet wrote: Read my lips: Oracle SQL can only handle 4K. 4k? What is the use of CLOB if it can only handle 4k, make it a VARCHAR2? That makes no sense. A stored procedure should be able to receive a CLOB and store it in a CLOB column. Heck, think of the articles on CNN and other sites. Do you think they are only 4k? Most images are greater than 4k also. |
#14
| |||
| |||
|
|
The Magnet wrote: On Sep 23, 11:36 am, "Gerard H. Pille"<g... (AT) skynet (DOT) be> *wrote: The Magnet wrote: Read my lips: Oracle SQL can only handle 4K. 4k? *What is the use of CLOB if it can only handle 4k, make it a VARCHAR2? *That makes no sense. A stored procedure should be able to receive a CLOB and store it in a CLOB column. *Heck, think of the articles on CNN and other sites. *Do you think they are only 4k? * Most images are greater than 4k also. Why don't you crawl back under your stone? |
#15
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Sep 23, 2:43 pm, "Gerard H. Pille"<g... (AT) skynet (DOT) be> wrote: The Magnet wrote: On Sep 23, 11:36 am, "Gerard H. Pille"<g... (AT) skynet (DOT) be> wrote: The Magnet wrote: Read my lips: Oracle SQL can only handle 4K. 4k? What is the use of CLOB if it can only handle 4k, make it a VARCHAR2? That makes no sense. A stored procedure should be able to receive a CLOB and store it in a CLOB column. Heck, think of the articles on CNN and other sites. Do you think they are only 4k? Most images are greater than 4k also. Why don't you crawl back under your stone? I see you forgot to take your medication today. |
#16
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Sep 23, 11:36Â*am, "Gerard H. Pille" <g... (AT) skynet (DOT) be> wrote: The Magnet wrote: Well, sorry for being like this. Â*But a CLOB can handle 4GB, right? So, I would think the problem is between PHP and Oracle, maybe something in the communication? Read my lips: Oracle SQL can only handle 4K. 4k? What is the use of CLOB if it can only handle 4k, make it a VARCHAR2? That makes no sense. A stored procedure should be able to receive a CLOB and store it in a CLOB column. Heck, think of the articles on CNN and other sites. Do you think they are only 4k? Most images are greater than 4k also. |
#17
| |||
| |||
|
#18
| |||
| |||
|
|
Since this thread is read by serious people too: today one of our developers ran into "not enough space" when filling a table with a lob column. He didn't understand how this happened, he had no way entered enough datato fill the tablespace. I checked, and the lobsegment was taking 240Mb for some 60Mb of data (sum(dbms_lob.getlength()). * I moved the lobsegment to another tablespace, and doing so the segment shrank to 100Mb. What should I do to prevent this waste of space? Thanks, Gerard |
#19
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Sep 29, 9:37 am, "Gerard H. Pille"<g... (AT) skynet (DOT) be> wrote: Since this thread is read by serious people too: today one of our developers ran into "not enough space" when filling a table with a lob column. He didn't understand how this happened, he had no way entered enough data to fill the tablespace. I checked, and the lobsegment was taking 240Mb for some 60Mb of data (sum(dbms_lob.getlength()). I moved the lobsegment to another tablespace, and doing so the segment shrank to 100Mb. What should I do to prevent this waste of space? Thanks, Gerard There have been discussions in various places about this, I don't have time to find the relevant ones, but here's a start: http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2...11/lob-sizing/ MOS How to determine the actual size of the LOB segments and how to free the deleted/unused space above/below the HWM [ID 386341.1] |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |