![]() | |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I have this enhancement where I have to EXCLUDE all users with roles 1000 but keeping following in mind 1) role < 1000 and user should not be in any other role OR 2) role < 1000 and role BETWEEN 9000 and 9010 and user should not be in any other role. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Pankaj says... I have this enhancement where I have to EXCLUDE all users with roles 1000 but keeping following in mind 1) role < 1000 and user should not be in any other role OR 2) role < 1000 and role BETWEEN 9000 and 9010 and user should not be in any other role. These two conditions seem to clash with each other, everyone that meets the second criteria seem to have been covered by the first one. GM |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Nov 10, 5:28*pm, Geoff Muldoon <geoff.muld... (AT) trap (DOT) gmail.com wrote: Pankaj says... I have this enhancement where I have to EXCLUDE all users with roles 1000 but keeping following in mind 1) role < 1000 and user should not be in any other role OR 2) role < 1000 and role BETWEEN 9000 and 9010 and user should not be in any other role. These two conditions seem to clash with each other, everyone that meets the second criteria seem to have been covered by the first one. GM Thanks Geoff. But user Moore becomes eligible for the first requirement (his role < 1000 and does not have any other role). and not for second (role < 1000 and does not have any role between 9000 and 9010). |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <dc224e63-918d-4755-a6c5-bfa67fa035b9 @h2g2000vbd.googlegroups.com>, Pankaj says... On Nov 10, 5:28*pm, Geoff Muldoon <geoff.muld... (AT) trap (DOT) gmail.com wrote: Pankaj says... I have this enhancement where I have to EXCLUDE all users with roles 1000 but keeping following in mind 1) role < 1000 and user should not be in any other role OR 2) role < 1000 and role BETWEEN 9000 and 9010 and user should not be in any other role. These two conditions seem to clash with each other, everyone that meets the second criteria seem to have been covered by the first one. GM Thanks Geoff. But user Moore becomes eligible for the first requirement (his role < 1000 and does not have any other role). and not for second (role < 1000 and does not have any role between 9000 and 9010). Moore currently only has a role of 45, so yes, he is eligible under the first requirement. If Moore also had a role of 9001, he would NOT be eligible under the FIRST requirement (even though he would be eligible under the second requirement) because the roles 9000-9010 are still part of "any other role". What are you trying to actually get? *Users that have roles that are only between 0-1000 and 9000-9010? GM- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Nov 10, 6:34*pm, Geoff Muldoon <geoff.muld... (AT) trap (DOT) gmail.com wrote: In article <dc224e63-918d-4755-a6c5-bfa67fa035b9 @h2g2000vbd.googlegroups.com>, Pankaj says... On Nov 10, 5:28*pm, Geoff Muldoon <geoff.muld... (AT) trap (DOT) gmail.com wrote: Pankaj says... I have this enhancement where I have to EXCLUDE all users with roles 1000 but keeping following in mind 1) role < 1000 and user should not be in any other role OR 2) role < 1000 and role BETWEEN 9000 and 9010 and user should notbe in any other role. These two conditions seem to clash with each other, everyone that meets the second criteria seem to have been covered by the first one. GM Thanks Geoff. But user Moore becomes eligible for the first requirement (his role < 1000 and does not have any other role). and not for second (role < 1000 and does not have any role between 9000 and 9010). Moore currently only has a role of 45, so yes, he is eligible under the first requirement. If Moore also had a role of 9001, he would NOT be eligible under the FIRST requirement (even though he would be eligible under the second requirement) because the roles 9000-9010 are still part of "any other role". What are you trying to actually get? *Users that have roles that are only between 0-1000 and 9000-9010? GM- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Geoff, Thats exactly what seems to be the dilemma here. I would explain again. We have set of users 1) with ONLY role < 1000 2) with ONLY (role < 1000 and BETWEEN 9000 and 9010) The requirement is to remove the users falling in above requirement, so following users would be excluded Should be EXCLUDED role User 23 James 24 James 90 James 23 Scott 9001 Scott But following user's should NOT BE EXCLUDED as they also belong to other roles apart from what has been described in above two points. Should be INCLUDED role User 23 James1 1002 James1 --Should be included as it belongs to role other than 1000 and between 9000 and 9010 9000 James1 9000 Scott1 -- Should be included as it is only part of between 9000 and 9010 and is not < 1000 1000 Brian1 1006 Brian2 I hope I was able to make myself more clearer. |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
Pankaj says... On Nov 10, 6:34*pm, Geoff Muldoon <geoff.muld... (AT) trap (DOT) gmail.com wrote: In article <dc224e63-918d-4755-a6c5-bfa67fa035b9 @h2g2000vbd.googlegroups.com>, Pankaj says... On Nov 10, 5:28*pm, Geoff Muldoon <geoff.muld... (AT) trap (DOT) gmail.com wrote: Pankaj says... I have this enhancement where I have to EXCLUDE all users with roles 1000 but keeping following in mind 1) role < 1000 and user should not be in any other role OR 2) role < 1000 and role BETWEEN 9000 and 9010 and user should not be in any other role. These two conditions seem to clash with each other, everyone thatmeets the second criteria seem to have been covered by the first one. GM Thanks Geoff. But user Moore becomes eligible for the first requirement (his role < 1000 and does not have any other role). and not for second (role < 1000 and does not have any role between 9000 and 9010). Moore currently only has a role of 45, so yes, he is eligible under the first requirement. If Moore also had a role of 9001, he would NOT be eligible under the FIRST requirement (even though he would be eligible under the second requirement) because the roles 9000-9010 are still part of "any other role". What are you trying to actually get? *Users that have roles that are only between 0-1000 and 9000-9010? GM- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Geoff, Thats exactly what seems to be the dilemma here. I would explain again. We have set of users 1) with ONLY role < 1000 2) with ONLY (role < 1000 and BETWEEN 9000 and 9010) The requirement is to remove the users falling in above requirement, so following users would be excluded Should be EXCLUDED role * User 23 * * James 24 * * James 90 * * James 23 * * Scott 9001 Scott But following user's should NOT BE EXCLUDED as they also belong to other roles apart from what has been described in above two points. Should be INCLUDED role * * User 23 * * * James1 1002 * James1 * *--Should be included as it belongs to role otherthan 1000 and between 9000 and 9010 9000 * James1 9000 * Scott1 * * -- Should be included as it is only part of between 9000 and 9010 and is not < 1000 1000 * Brian1 1006 * Brian2 I hope I was able to make myself more clearer. Create a sub-query: select user, * * sum(case when <less than 1000 condition * * * * * * * * *then 1 else 0 * * * * end) as count_under_1000, * * sum(case when <between 9000 and 9010 condition * * * * * * * * *then 1 else 0 * * * * end) as count_special_val, * * count(role) as count_all from <table group by user Then select the records from this sub-query to match your logic based on the numbers in those calculated value columns. GM GM- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |