![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
#3
| |||
| |||
|
#4
| |||
| |||
|
#5
| |||
| |||
|
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi Andreas, Maybe it is a solution to create a unique ID for each location. A new table TTreeLocations with LocationID, LocationType (Street, Park, ...), ObjectID (this being the ID of street, park etc.) would be a way to do this. Best, Hans |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi Andreas, Maybe it is a solution to create a unique ID for each location. A new table TTreeLocations with LocationID, LocationType (Street, Park, ...), ObjectID (this being the ID of street, park etc.) would be a way to do this. Best, Hans |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi Andreas, Maybe it is a solution to create a unique ID for each location. A new table TTreeLocations with LocationID, LocationType (Street, Park, ...), ObjectID (this being the ID of street, park etc.) would be a way to do this. Best, Hans |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi Andreas, Maybe it is a solution to create a unique ID for each location. A new table TTreeLocations with LocationID, LocationType (Street, Park, ...), ObjectID (this being the ID of street, park etc.) would be a way to do this. Best, Hans |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
Soory, but I can not find the difference. If I understand correct you suggest to create a table TTreeLocations with a primary key LocationID and an ObjectID that now has to refer different tables, street, park ... It is no problem to use 1 sequence for all referred tables street, park and so on, but how can I write a constraint, that ensures, that my ObjectID is to be found in (exactly) one of these tables? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |