![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
- Do I really need an Oracle client installed on the web server Depends on which interface you plan to use, and which capabilities you |
|
- Is "Microsoft ODBC for Oracle" enough for ASP to talk to the Oracle database? I would strongly recommend *against* using the Microsoft driver. It |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
- Do I really need an Oracle client installed on the web server Depends on which interface you plan to use, and which capabilities you |
|
- Is "Microsoft ODBC for Oracle" enough for ASP to talk to the Oracle database? I would strongly recommend *against* using the Microsoft driver. It |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
- Do I really need an Oracle client installed on the web server Depends on which interface you plan to use, and which capabilities you |
|
- Is "Microsoft ODBC for Oracle" enough for ASP to talk to the Oracle database? I would strongly recommend *against* using the Microsoft driver. It |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
- Do I really need an Oracle client installed on the web server Depends on which interface you plan to use, and which capabilities you |
|
- Is "Microsoft ODBC for Oracle" enough for ASP to talk to the Oracle database? I would strongly recommend *against* using the Microsoft driver. It |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 05:36:41 GMT, Louis <t051315 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote: - Do I really need an Oracle client installed on the web server Depends on which interface you plan to use, and which capabilities you need. The jdbc thin driver doesn't need a client. All other options, like the full jdbc driver, and odbc or ole or .net do. Which client (instant or full) would depend on Oracle version, which you can't be bothered to mention - Is "Microsoft ODBC for Oracle" enough for ASP to talk to the Oracle database? I would strongly recommend *against* using the Microsoft driver. It has numerous compatibility issues (ie sql which does work using the Oracle ODBC driver doesn't work using the Microsoft one), and Microsoft never ever implemented any Oracle feature beyond 7.3 If you only need to access Oracle I would go OLE or ODP Apart from that, the ODBC driver definitily needs the Oracle client, whether you use Microsofts driver or Oracles. Thanks for the response. Although I admit that I am still fuzzy on what |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 05:36:41 GMT, Louis <t051315 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote: - Do I really need an Oracle client installed on the web server Depends on which interface you plan to use, and which capabilities you need. The jdbc thin driver doesn't need a client. All other options, like the full jdbc driver, and odbc or ole or .net do. Which client (instant or full) would depend on Oracle version, which you can't be bothered to mention - Is "Microsoft ODBC for Oracle" enough for ASP to talk to the Oracle database? I would strongly recommend *against* using the Microsoft driver. It has numerous compatibility issues (ie sql which does work using the Oracle ODBC driver doesn't work using the Microsoft one), and Microsoft never ever implemented any Oracle feature beyond 7.3 If you only need to access Oracle I would go OLE or ODP Apart from that, the ODBC driver definitily needs the Oracle client, whether you use Microsofts driver or Oracles. Thanks for the response. Although I admit that I am still fuzzy on what |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 05:36:41 GMT, Louis <t051315 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote: - Do I really need an Oracle client installed on the web server Depends on which interface you plan to use, and which capabilities you need. The jdbc thin driver doesn't need a client. All other options, like the full jdbc driver, and odbc or ole or .net do. Which client (instant or full) would depend on Oracle version, which you can't be bothered to mention - Is "Microsoft ODBC for Oracle" enough for ASP to talk to the Oracle database? I would strongly recommend *against* using the Microsoft driver. It has numerous compatibility issues (ie sql which does work using the Oracle ODBC driver doesn't work using the Microsoft one), and Microsoft never ever implemented any Oracle feature beyond 7.3 If you only need to access Oracle I would go OLE or ODP Apart from that, the ODBC driver definitily needs the Oracle client, whether you use Microsofts driver or Oracles. Thanks for the response. Although I admit that I am still fuzzy on what |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 05:36:41 GMT, Louis <t051315 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote: - Do I really need an Oracle client installed on the web server Depends on which interface you plan to use, and which capabilities you need. The jdbc thin driver doesn't need a client. All other options, like the full jdbc driver, and odbc or ole or .net do. Which client (instant or full) would depend on Oracle version, which you can't be bothered to mention - Is "Microsoft ODBC for Oracle" enough for ASP to talk to the Oracle database? I would strongly recommend *against* using the Microsoft driver. It has numerous compatibility issues (ie sql which does work using the Oracle ODBC driver doesn't work using the Microsoft one), and Microsoft never ever implemented any Oracle feature beyond 7.3 If you only need to access Oracle I would go OLE or ODP Apart from that, the ODBC driver definitily needs the Oracle client, whether you use Microsofts driver or Oracles. Thanks for the response. Although I admit that I am still fuzzy on what |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
Thanks for the response. Although I admit that I am still fuzzy on what I need to solve my problem cause I am not familiar with all the driver names etc. It will take me some time to look up what they do. Thank you. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |