![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
| |||
| |||
|
|
How can I do instead of using package in my example, use a standard sql. select t.column_1, t.column_2, t2.name , ... where t2.name = t. my_package.my_func(t.column_1, '2') ... from my_table t, my_table2 t2 where t2.name = t.name || ' - 1' (*) the (*) doesn't work. What should I do instead ? Thanks ![]() |
#12
| |||
| |||
|
|
How can I do instead of using package in my example, use a standard sql. select t.column_1, t.column_2, t2.name , ... where t2.name = t. my_package.my_func(t.column_1, '2') ... from my_table t, my_table2 t2 where t2.name = t.name || ' - 1' (*) the (*) doesn't work. What should I do instead ? Thanks ![]() |
#13
| |||
| |||
|
|
How can I do instead of using package in my example, use a standard sql. select t.column_1, t.column_2, t2.name , ... where t2.name = t. my_package.my_func(t.column_1, '2') ... from my_table t, my_table2 t2 where t2.name = t.name || ' - 1' (*) the (*) doesn't work. What should I do instead ? Thanks ![]() |
#14
| |||
| |||
|
|
cannot find any reason to use user defined functions at all in this case. You can do all that in just one SQL statement, it would be much faster and better understandable. Gints Plivnahttp://www.gplivna.eu |
#15
| |||
| |||
|
|
cannot find any reason to use user defined functions at all in this case. You can do all that in just one SQL statement, it would be much faster and better understandable. Gints Plivnahttp://www.gplivna.eu |
#16
| |||
| |||
|
|
cannot find any reason to use user defined functions at all in this case. You can do all that in just one SQL statement, it would be much faster and better understandable. Gints Plivnahttp://www.gplivna.eu |
#17
| |||
| |||
|
|
cannot find any reason to use user defined functions at all in this case. You can do all that in just one SQL statement, it would be much faster and better understandable. Gints Plivnahttp://www.gplivna.eu |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |