![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
In the 'Dependent Data mart' case, there is an ETL layer to extract the data from the central Data Warehouse to adapt and Load onto the 'Data mart'. Assume that the 'Data warehouse' and 'Data mart' run on separate physical servers. In such a case, where does the ETL layer (which is used to load onto Datamart from Datawarehouse) fit better? Should it be part of 'Data warehouse' box, or the 'Datamart' box? Why? |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Mar 18, 11:29*am, guser78 <qazmlp1... (AT) rediffmail (DOT) com> wrote: In the 'Dependent Data mart' case, there is an ETL layer to extract the data from the central Data Warehouse to adapt and Load onto the 'Data mart'. Assume that the 'Data warehouse' and 'Data mart' run on separate physical servers. In such a case, where does the ETL layer (which is used to load onto Datamart from Datawarehouse) fit better? Should it be part of 'Data warehouse' box, or the 'Datamart' box? Why? "Should it be part of 'Data warehouse' box, or the 'Datamart' box?" Neither of them. It should be on a separate ETL server with the ETL tools and processes installed on it (and a lot of free HD space too). I agree with that. But, what do you choose when you have the option of |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Mar 18, 11:29*am, guser78 <qazmlp1... (AT) rediffmail (DOT) com> wrote: In the 'Dependent Data mart' case, there is an ETL layer to extract the data from the central Data Warehouse to adapt and Load onto the 'Data mart'. Assume that the 'Data warehouse' and 'Data mart' run on separate physical servers. In such a case, where does the ETL layer (which is used to load onto Datamart from Datawarehouse) fit better? Should it be part of 'Data warehouse' box, or the 'Datamart' box? Why? "Should it be part of 'Data warehouse' box, or the 'Datamart' box?" Neither of them. It should be on a separate ETL server with the ETL tools and processes installed on it (and a lot of free HD space too). |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Mar 18, 8:03*pm, Carlos <miotromailcar... (AT) netscape (DOT) net> wrote: On Mar 18, 11:29*am, guser78 <qazmlp1... (AT) rediffmail (DOT) com> wrote: In the 'Dependent Data mart' case, there is an ETL layer to extract the data from the central Data Warehouse to adapt and Load onto the 'Data mart'. Assume that the 'Data warehouse' and 'Data mart' run on separate physical servers. In such a case, where does the ETL layer (which is used to load onto Datamart from Datawarehouse) fit better? Should it be part of 'Data warehouse' box, or the 'Datamart' box? Why? "Should it be part of 'Data warehouse' box, or the 'Datamart' box?" Neither of them. It should be on a separate ETL server with the ETL tools and processes installed on it (and a lot of free HD space too). I agree with that. But, what do you do when you have the option of having only 2 physical servers (1->DWH, 1->Datamart, ETL:where?)? |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
Assume that the 'Data warehouse' and 'Data mart' run on separate physical servers. In such a case, where does the ETL layer (which is used to load onto Datamart from Datawarehouse) fit better? Should it be part of 'Data warehouse' box, or the 'Datamart' box? Why? "Should it be part of 'Data warehouse' box, or the 'Datamart' box?" Neither of them. It should be on a separate ETL server with the ETL tools and processes installed on it (and a lot of free HD space too). I agree with that. But, what do you do when you have the option of having only 2 physical servers (1->DWH, 1->Datamart, ETL:where?)? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |