![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
this is to uniquely identify a record. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
this is to uniquely identify a record. In what way do you mean 'uniquely identify a record'. Is the rowid not unique enough? If not, could you perhaps use the DBMS_CRYPTO.Hash function? |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
ROWID won't do in this case, BINA ... |
|
Very hard to tell without knowing the task at hand. |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
hello gents, i have a task of porting from sql server to oracle, i am looking for help on the following IN sql server i write ----------- SELECT BINARY_CHECKSUM ( FIELD_A,FIELD_B,FIELD_C,FIELD_D) AS CHK FROM TEST_TABLE ------------- i dont have a function which is equivalent to binary_checksum. can i have this in any other way. this is to uniquely identify a record. |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
Please expand. (If the uniqueness MUST BE based on a hash, I agree with your assessment. If it's just plain uniqueness, then I'm intrigued by your answer.) |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
Please expand. (If the uniqueness MUST BE based on a hash, I agree with your assessment. If it's just plain uniqueness, then I'm intrigued by your answer.) |

#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
Please expand. (If the uniqueness MUST BE based on a hash, I agree with your assessment. If it's just plain uniqueness, then I'm intrigued by your answer.) On second thought, if OP really meant to use BINARY_CHECKSUM to uniquely identify rows, then ROWID is certainly what he's after, especially in the absence of primary keys. ![]() |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
#10
| |||
| |||
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |