dbTalk Databases Forums  

ASM disk management on AIX 5.3

comp.databases.oracle.misc comp.databases.oracle.misc


Discuss ASM disk management on AIX 5.3 in the comp.databases.oracle.misc forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
AT
 
Posts: n/a

Default ASM disk management on AIX 5.3 - 05-01-2006 , 02:44 AM






Hi,

We are using Oracle/RAC 10GR2 with ASM for disk management of diskspace

used by the database. ASM requires that the disks are NOT included in a

volume group and also uses the first block of the disk to store
essential information. RAC 10GR2 does not need HACMP anymore.
This setup imposes a serious problem for AIX systemmanagement:
1) It is difficult to distinguish disks on the AIX servers since they
are not part of a volume group.
2) The usage of the first block by Oracle implies that chdev may not be

used to create a PVID, since chdev overwrites the first block. If chdev

is being used on a ASM disk, Oracle can not read that disk, and the
database is lost.
3) Since ASM disks are writable by all servers in the cluster,
reserve_policy is switched off, the probability that a disk is by
accident used for a volume group is not unthinkable, with fatal
consequences for the database.
4) Changes in SAN configuration may imply that existing devices have to

be rearranged with rmdev. Rmdev removes disk devices and other devices
nodes in /dev having equal major/minor number. Using sybolic names for
hdisk devices in the Oracle database by creating devices nodes in /dev
is not a viable option.

Question:
Does anybody recognise these issues, and is there a workaround so that
ASM gets better integrated into standard AIX system management ?.


Thanks in advance.


Erik


Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
AT
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: ASM disk management on AIX 5.3 - 05-01-2006 , 06:01 PM






I've been saying for years that there is a risk of overwriting raw
devices, but people just dismiss it with "that's not an issue with
modern volume managers." Therefore, it needs to be handled with local
digit removal procedures for violations.

So the answer is, no, nobody recognizes these issues.

Hopefully, someone will come up with a better answer than that.

jg
--
@home.com is bogus.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/q...&dopt=Abstract


Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.