Ramon F Herrera wrote,on my timestamp of 5/10/2009 12:06 AM:
Quote:
(3) Even in C, a very simple programming language, I have found the
Oracle implementation to be rather primitive (compared to gcc). I
shudder to think the kinds of mess I would get myself into if I tried
to uses classes. |
I was not aware Oracle had a C compiler implementation?
Quote:
I guess the follow-up question is: Has anyone out there been able to
use classes in conjunction to Pro*C/C++? I highly doubt it. |
Nope, never bothered. C++ is most definitely not on as a OO language, no point
in wasting time with it. If I wanted to use a OOL, C++ would be my last choice.
Quote:
Bonus question: My Oracle version is 10g. Has Pro*C/C++ improved much
along these 5 years? I am considering the perennial question: to
upgrade or not to upgrade? |
It hasn't changed much except for optimisations to do with the client-side cache
and so on. And that's a good thing, IMHO. Doesn't mean one should not upgrade
past 10g, if nothing else to get the latest on the db. If it doesn't cause
compatibility problems with current applications, I'm all for it.