dbTalk Databases Forums  

10g RAC using SAN for storage

comp.databases.oracle.misc comp.databases.oracle.misc


Discuss 10g RAC using SAN for storage in the comp.databases.oracle.misc forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old   
Ana C. Dent
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 10g RAC using SAN for storage - 09-17-2008 , 10:08 PM






macdba321 <macdba321 (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in
news:2050e606-97a5-4742-a433-9042c04a364c (AT) e39g2000hsf (DOT) googlegroups.com:

Quote:
When you state "Two double port NIC cards and two dual channel
HBAs" ...... do you mean in total? (ie, 1 double-port NIC and 1 dual-
channel HBA per node?)
Also, for a completely prototype/testing/learning effort, what are the
drawbacks to using a single-channel HBA per node?
A couple of the advantages of RAC are redundancy & failover.
With the h/w above, you have no single point of failure.


Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old   
DA Morgan
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 10g RAC using SAN for storage - 09-27-2008 , 12:13 AM






macdba321 wrote:
Quote:
On Sep 16, 6:10 pm, DA Morgan <damor... (AT) psoug (DOT) org> wrote:
macdba321 wrote:
On Sep 15, 4:52 pm, DA Morgan <damor... (AT) psoug (DOT) org> wrote:
macdba321 wrote:
On Sep 12, 9:29 pm, DA Morgan <damor... (AT) psoug (DOT) org> wrote:
macdba321 wrote:
On Sep 12, 9:35 am, DA Morgan <damor... (AT) psoug (DOT) org> wrote:
macdba321 wrote:
I am testing a 2 node RAC setup and want to try using a SAN for the
dedicated storage (instead of a dedicated local storage disk array
located within the same frame).
Are there any "gotchas" that I should be aware of when using the SAN
for storage as opposed to a typical storage array?
Thanks!
How did you use "dedicated local storage disk" and make it shared
everything?
You've said nothing of CFS or ASM or RAW. Why?
The biggest potential issue with a SAN is labeling the disks used
for the voting disk and OCR so that they are mounted in the correct
order by the O/S.
--
Daniel A. Morgan
Oracle Ace Director & Instructor
University of Washington
damor...@x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond)
Puget Sound Oracle Users Groupwww.psoug.org
Thanks for the reply.
I plan to use ASM over raw devices. (Again, this is purely for test/
learning, not a production application.)
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm assuming that I'll need HBAs
for both nodes to connect to the same LUNs on the SAN? (There's no way
to do it without the HBA is there?)
Thanks.
Not with a SAN unless you have an antique with fibre protocol over
copper and can find drivers for it. Another possibility is to use
iSCSI drivers.
--
Daniel A. Morgan
Oracle Ace Director & Instructor
University of Washington
damor...@x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond)
Puget Sound Oracle Users Groupwww.psoug.org
Thanks again for the reply. I will proceed with acquiring HBAs for
each node.
A related question if I may: Why would one require a single-channel
Vs. dual-channel HBA in each node?
Thanks again!
Dual channel cards are good for bonding to obtain higher bandwidth.
I like to have two cards, bonded, so that if one card fails it does
not become a single point of failure.
--
Daniel A. Morgan
Oracle Ace Director & Instructor
University of Washington
damor...@x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond)
Puget Sound Oracle Users Groupwww.psoug.org
Thanks again.
For a prototype effort though, I could proceed with single channel
HBAs on each node, correct?
One additional question, if the nodes have multiple NIC cards, would
they serve as the "dedicated high-speed interconnect" that rac
requires?
Thanks!
You should have a minimum of four interfaces.
Two double port NIC cards and two dual channel HBAs.
Again, bond so that you have two paths to public, two paths for cache
fusion and two paths for storage (HBA).
--
Daniel A. Morgan
Oracle Ace Director & Instructor
University of Washington
damor...@x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond)
Puget Sound Oracle Users Groupwww.psoug.org

When you state "Two double port NIC cards and two dual channel
HBAs" ...... do you mean in total? (ie, 1 double-port NIC and 1 dual-
channel HBA per node?)
Also, for a completely prototype/testing/learning effort, what are the
drawbacks to using a single-channel HBA per node?

Thanks again!!!!!

(section 2.1.4 of OracleŽ Database High Availability Best Practices is
the only applicable search result reference to "HBA" in the online
documentation that I found.)
No. I mean TWO dual-port NIC cards for a total of four RJ45 connections
plus TWO single or dual port HBA cards.
--
Daniel A. Morgan
Oracle Ace Director & Instructor
University of Washington
damorgan@x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond)
Puget Sound Oracle Users Group
www.psoug.org


Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old   
DA Morgan
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 10g RAC using SAN for storage - 09-27-2008 , 12:13 AM



macdba321 wrote:
Quote:
On Sep 16, 6:10 pm, DA Morgan <damor... (AT) psoug (DOT) org> wrote:
macdba321 wrote:
On Sep 15, 4:52 pm, DA Morgan <damor... (AT) psoug (DOT) org> wrote:
macdba321 wrote:
On Sep 12, 9:29 pm, DA Morgan <damor... (AT) psoug (DOT) org> wrote:
macdba321 wrote:
On Sep 12, 9:35 am, DA Morgan <damor... (AT) psoug (DOT) org> wrote:
macdba321 wrote:
I am testing a 2 node RAC setup and want to try using a SAN for the
dedicated storage (instead of a dedicated local storage disk array
located within the same frame).
Are there any "gotchas" that I should be aware of when using the SAN
for storage as opposed to a typical storage array?
Thanks!
How did you use "dedicated local storage disk" and make it shared
everything?
You've said nothing of CFS or ASM or RAW. Why?
The biggest potential issue with a SAN is labeling the disks used
for the voting disk and OCR so that they are mounted in the correct
order by the O/S.
--
Daniel A. Morgan
Oracle Ace Director & Instructor
University of Washington
damor...@x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond)
Puget Sound Oracle Users Groupwww.psoug.org
Thanks for the reply.
I plan to use ASM over raw devices. (Again, this is purely for test/
learning, not a production application.)
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm assuming that I'll need HBAs
for both nodes to connect to the same LUNs on the SAN? (There's no way
to do it without the HBA is there?)
Thanks.
Not with a SAN unless you have an antique with fibre protocol over
copper and can find drivers for it. Another possibility is to use
iSCSI drivers.
--
Daniel A. Morgan
Oracle Ace Director & Instructor
University of Washington
damor...@x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond)
Puget Sound Oracle Users Groupwww.psoug.org
Thanks again for the reply. I will proceed with acquiring HBAs for
each node.
A related question if I may: Why would one require a single-channel
Vs. dual-channel HBA in each node?
Thanks again!
Dual channel cards are good for bonding to obtain higher bandwidth.
I like to have two cards, bonded, so that if one card fails it does
not become a single point of failure.
--
Daniel A. Morgan
Oracle Ace Director & Instructor
University of Washington
damor...@x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond)
Puget Sound Oracle Users Groupwww.psoug.org
Thanks again.
For a prototype effort though, I could proceed with single channel
HBAs on each node, correct?
One additional question, if the nodes have multiple NIC cards, would
they serve as the "dedicated high-speed interconnect" that rac
requires?
Thanks!
You should have a minimum of four interfaces.
Two double port NIC cards and two dual channel HBAs.
Again, bond so that you have two paths to public, two paths for cache
fusion and two paths for storage (HBA).
--
Daniel A. Morgan
Oracle Ace Director & Instructor
University of Washington
damor...@x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond)
Puget Sound Oracle Users Groupwww.psoug.org

When you state "Two double port NIC cards and two dual channel
HBAs" ...... do you mean in total? (ie, 1 double-port NIC and 1 dual-
channel HBA per node?)
Also, for a completely prototype/testing/learning effort, what are the
drawbacks to using a single-channel HBA per node?

Thanks again!!!!!

(section 2.1.4 of OracleŽ Database High Availability Best Practices is
the only applicable search result reference to "HBA" in the online
documentation that I found.)
No. I mean TWO dual-port NIC cards for a total of four RJ45 connections
plus TWO single or dual port HBA cards.
--
Daniel A. Morgan
Oracle Ace Director & Instructor
University of Washington
damorgan@x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond)
Puget Sound Oracle Users Group
www.psoug.org


Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old   
DA Morgan
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 10g RAC using SAN for storage - 09-27-2008 , 12:13 AM



macdba321 wrote:
Quote:
On Sep 16, 6:10 pm, DA Morgan <damor... (AT) psoug (DOT) org> wrote:
macdba321 wrote:
On Sep 15, 4:52 pm, DA Morgan <damor... (AT) psoug (DOT) org> wrote:
macdba321 wrote:
On Sep 12, 9:29 pm, DA Morgan <damor... (AT) psoug (DOT) org> wrote:
macdba321 wrote:
On Sep 12, 9:35 am, DA Morgan <damor... (AT) psoug (DOT) org> wrote:
macdba321 wrote:
I am testing a 2 node RAC setup and want to try using a SAN for the
dedicated storage (instead of a dedicated local storage disk array
located within the same frame).
Are there any "gotchas" that I should be aware of when using the SAN
for storage as opposed to a typical storage array?
Thanks!
How did you use "dedicated local storage disk" and make it shared
everything?
You've said nothing of CFS or ASM or RAW. Why?
The biggest potential issue with a SAN is labeling the disks used
for the voting disk and OCR so that they are mounted in the correct
order by the O/S.
--
Daniel A. Morgan
Oracle Ace Director & Instructor
University of Washington
damor...@x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond)
Puget Sound Oracle Users Groupwww.psoug.org
Thanks for the reply.
I plan to use ASM over raw devices. (Again, this is purely for test/
learning, not a production application.)
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm assuming that I'll need HBAs
for both nodes to connect to the same LUNs on the SAN? (There's no way
to do it without the HBA is there?)
Thanks.
Not with a SAN unless you have an antique with fibre protocol over
copper and can find drivers for it. Another possibility is to use
iSCSI drivers.
--
Daniel A. Morgan
Oracle Ace Director & Instructor
University of Washington
damor...@x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond)
Puget Sound Oracle Users Groupwww.psoug.org
Thanks again for the reply. I will proceed with acquiring HBAs for
each node.
A related question if I may: Why would one require a single-channel
Vs. dual-channel HBA in each node?
Thanks again!
Dual channel cards are good for bonding to obtain higher bandwidth.
I like to have two cards, bonded, so that if one card fails it does
not become a single point of failure.
--
Daniel A. Morgan
Oracle Ace Director & Instructor
University of Washington
damor...@x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond)
Puget Sound Oracle Users Groupwww.psoug.org
Thanks again.
For a prototype effort though, I could proceed with single channel
HBAs on each node, correct?
One additional question, if the nodes have multiple NIC cards, would
they serve as the "dedicated high-speed interconnect" that rac
requires?
Thanks!
You should have a minimum of four interfaces.
Two double port NIC cards and two dual channel HBAs.
Again, bond so that you have two paths to public, two paths for cache
fusion and two paths for storage (HBA).
--
Daniel A. Morgan
Oracle Ace Director & Instructor
University of Washington
damor...@x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond)
Puget Sound Oracle Users Groupwww.psoug.org

When you state "Two double port NIC cards and two dual channel
HBAs" ...... do you mean in total? (ie, 1 double-port NIC and 1 dual-
channel HBA per node?)
Also, for a completely prototype/testing/learning effort, what are the
drawbacks to using a single-channel HBA per node?

Thanks again!!!!!

(section 2.1.4 of OracleŽ Database High Availability Best Practices is
the only applicable search result reference to "HBA" in the online
documentation that I found.)
No. I mean TWO dual-port NIC cards for a total of four RJ45 connections
plus TWO single or dual port HBA cards.
--
Daniel A. Morgan
Oracle Ace Director & Instructor
University of Washington
damorgan@x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond)
Puget Sound Oracle Users Group
www.psoug.org


Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old   
DA Morgan
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: 10g RAC using SAN for storage - 09-27-2008 , 12:13 AM



macdba321 wrote:
Quote:
On Sep 16, 6:10 pm, DA Morgan <damor... (AT) psoug (DOT) org> wrote:
macdba321 wrote:
On Sep 15, 4:52 pm, DA Morgan <damor... (AT) psoug (DOT) org> wrote:
macdba321 wrote:
On Sep 12, 9:29 pm, DA Morgan <damor... (AT) psoug (DOT) org> wrote:
macdba321 wrote:
On Sep 12, 9:35 am, DA Morgan <damor... (AT) psoug (DOT) org> wrote:
macdba321 wrote:
I am testing a 2 node RAC setup and want to try using a SAN for the
dedicated storage (instead of a dedicated local storage disk array
located within the same frame).
Are there any "gotchas" that I should be aware of when using the SAN
for storage as opposed to a typical storage array?
Thanks!
How did you use "dedicated local storage disk" and make it shared
everything?
You've said nothing of CFS or ASM or RAW. Why?
The biggest potential issue with a SAN is labeling the disks used
for the voting disk and OCR so that they are mounted in the correct
order by the O/S.
--
Daniel A. Morgan
Oracle Ace Director & Instructor
University of Washington
damor...@x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond)
Puget Sound Oracle Users Groupwww.psoug.org
Thanks for the reply.
I plan to use ASM over raw devices. (Again, this is purely for test/
learning, not a production application.)
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm assuming that I'll need HBAs
for both nodes to connect to the same LUNs on the SAN? (There's no way
to do it without the HBA is there?)
Thanks.
Not with a SAN unless you have an antique with fibre protocol over
copper and can find drivers for it. Another possibility is to use
iSCSI drivers.
--
Daniel A. Morgan
Oracle Ace Director & Instructor
University of Washington
damor...@x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond)
Puget Sound Oracle Users Groupwww.psoug.org
Thanks again for the reply. I will proceed with acquiring HBAs for
each node.
A related question if I may: Why would one require a single-channel
Vs. dual-channel HBA in each node?
Thanks again!
Dual channel cards are good for bonding to obtain higher bandwidth.
I like to have two cards, bonded, so that if one card fails it does
not become a single point of failure.
--
Daniel A. Morgan
Oracle Ace Director & Instructor
University of Washington
damor...@x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond)
Puget Sound Oracle Users Groupwww.psoug.org
Thanks again.
For a prototype effort though, I could proceed with single channel
HBAs on each node, correct?
One additional question, if the nodes have multiple NIC cards, would
they serve as the "dedicated high-speed interconnect" that rac
requires?
Thanks!
You should have a minimum of four interfaces.
Two double port NIC cards and two dual channel HBAs.
Again, bond so that you have two paths to public, two paths for cache
fusion and two paths for storage (HBA).
--
Daniel A. Morgan
Oracle Ace Director & Instructor
University of Washington
damor...@x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond)
Puget Sound Oracle Users Groupwww.psoug.org

When you state "Two double port NIC cards and two dual channel
HBAs" ...... do you mean in total? (ie, 1 double-port NIC and 1 dual-
channel HBA per node?)
Also, for a completely prototype/testing/learning effort, what are the
drawbacks to using a single-channel HBA per node?

Thanks again!!!!!

(section 2.1.4 of OracleŽ Database High Availability Best Practices is
the only applicable search result reference to "HBA" in the online
documentation that I found.)
No. I mean TWO dual-port NIC cards for a total of four RJ45 connections
plus TWO single or dual port HBA cards.
--
Daniel A. Morgan
Oracle Ace Director & Instructor
University of Washington
damorgan@x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond)
Puget Sound Oracle Users Group
www.psoug.org


Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.