![]() | |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
To all Is there a quick way to tell a the highest number of children for any member in a dimension without iterating through each member? Thanks in advance Howard.Taylor@ domain below www.o2olap.com Microsoft Certified Partner |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
It depends on what you mean by iterating, as many MDX functions cause iteration under the covers. It's doable in MDX, sans procedural code, if that's what you mean. When looking for max children, is that throughout all levels, or just a given level? Do you want to know the number of children and/or the parent member? public @ the domain below www.tomchester.net "Howard Taylor [O2OLAP]" <Remove.Howard.Taylor (AT) o2olap (DOT) com> wrote in message news:c5mqhj$9tb$1 (AT) titan (DOT) btinternet.com... To all Is there a quick way to tell a the highest number of children for any member in a dimension without iterating through each member? Thanks in advance Howard.Taylor@ domain below www.o2olap.com Microsoft Certified Partner |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Tom Thanks for the reply. I need to know the highest number of children for a dimension, i.e. if you had a 100 members and one of them had 20 children and the others less than 20, I need to get the number 20 without iterating through each of the members. Thanks Howard.Taylor@ domain below www.o2olap.com Microsoft Certified Partner "Tom Chester" <nospam_public (AT) tomchester (DOT) net> wrote in message news:%FUfc.22$_83.32194 (AT) news (DOT) uswest.net... It depends on what you mean by iterating, as many MDX functions cause iteration under the covers. It's doable in MDX, sans procedural code, if that's what you mean. When looking for max children, is that throughout all levels, or just a given level? Do you want to know the number of children and/or the parent member? public @ the domain below www.tomchester.net "Howard Taylor [O2OLAP]" <Remove.Howard.Taylor (AT) o2olap (DOT) com> wrote in message news:c5mqhj$9tb$1 (AT) titan (DOT) btinternet.com... To all Is there a quick way to tell a the highest number of children for any member in a dimension without iterating through each member? Thanks in advance Howard.Taylor@ domain below www.o2olap.com Microsoft Certified Partner |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
Why not update a calc measure or a property in the parent via a DTS package when the cube is built? Steve "Howard Taylor [O2OLAP]" <Remove.Howard.Taylor (AT) o2olap (DOT) com> wrote in message news:c5sufs$9lf$1 (AT) titan (DOT) btinternet.com... Tom Thanks for the reply. I need to know the highest number of children for a dimension, i.e. if you had a 100 members and one of them had 20 children and the others less than 20, I need to get the number 20 without iterating through each of the members. Thanks Howard.Taylor@ domain below www.o2olap.com Microsoft Certified Partner "Tom Chester" <nospam_public (AT) tomchester (DOT) net> wrote in message news:%FUfc.22$_83.32194 (AT) news (DOT) uswest.net... It depends on what you mean by iterating, as many MDX functions cause iteration under the covers. It's doable in MDX, sans procedural code, if that's what you mean. When looking for max children, is that throughout all levels, or just a given level? Do you want to know the number of children and/or the parent member? public @ the domain below www.tomchester.net "Howard Taylor [O2OLAP]" <Remove.Howard.Taylor (AT) o2olap (DOT) com> wrote in message news:c5mqhj$9tb$1 (AT) titan (DOT) btinternet.com... To all Is there a quick way to tell a the highest number of children for any member in a dimension without iterating through each member? Thanks in advance Howard.Taylor@ domain below www.o2olap.com Microsoft Certified Partner |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |