![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Brad, please see my comments inline. "Bradley Plett" <plettb (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:eknci0hp8bvijnq0qcg207t9svb53vt317 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... We are in the process of trying to find a strategic reporting solution for our company. To that end, I'd like to get some opinions on the strengths and weaknesses of various product, and how they stack up against MS RS. In addition to extending our existing solution and/or using MS RS, some of the solutions we're considering are: Actuate, Business Objects, Cognos ReportNet, dynaSight, Hyperion SQR, MicroStrategy Report Services, Report Portal, etc. dynaSight is the only tool that is built for a slightly different purpose: it is a development environment for building webbased dashboards and mgmt cockipts. Nevertheless you can build reports with it. You will just have to develop a little bit more. Here is our situation. We have a fairly large (400GB) database. We need to be able to generate reports from our data. The reports will be a mixture of pre-developed ("canned") reports and more ad-hoc, user-definable reports. The primary distribution mechanism will be the internet. At present we do not expect much of a distribution process - simply clients bringing up reports in their browsers. All of the above tools will meet this requirement. To date we have hand-coded most of our reports with a combination of ASP.NET/VB.NET and Crystal Reports. However, our reporting requirements are beginning to explode, and we need more of a strategic solution. In particular, we would like to start looking at empowering our end clients (at least some of the more technically sophisticated ones :-) to be able to create and run ad-hoc reports for themselves, without requiring a developer to code each new report. The ad-hoc reports could include anything from simple list reports to complicated reports containing pivot tables, graphs, etc. BO, CRN, MSTR provide webbased report development and ad-hoc-reporting. Actuate and Sqribe use full client tools for building reports. We are a small company with some large clients. The large clients will be viewing reports, but they in turn have smaller clients that may also need to have access to the reports. As a result, one of the things that will be quite important in our final solution is good data-partitioning. Whereas this may be something we need to push down to the database layer, it would be a "very nice to have" if the reporting solution included something to facilitate this as well. All solutions provide some more or less sophisticated load balancing. Since most of them don't store or cache data there is no need to partition data. If your DWH is partitioned though the tools are capable to deal with that. In addition to the data partitioning, we will need some kind of hierarchical security system, with role-based security. Again, this is something that we might be able to push out to Active Directory, but we will be more inclined to have a custom, database-driven solution using Forms Authentication. All of the tools provide this. MS RS to the smalest extend in my opinion. We would like the solution to continue to run in the context of IIS, rather than requiring a separate application server. We would like it to fit into our .NET environment (i.e. not be a J2EE solution). I am sure about BO, CRN, MSTR meet this requirement also. dynaSight doesn't provide an external programming interface. Given all of these constraints, today's version of MS RS may fit our environment best, but comes up a little short on the list. It's possible that when SQL2k5, together with ActiveViews, comes out, it will be a closer match. However, whereas we might be able to wait that long for a solution, it is still unclear whether even that will sufficiently meet our needs. In the mean time, we also need to do due diligence and look at the alternatives. Invite the vendors for a presentation, two hours each and do a workshop with the best ones. Since your requirements weren't very specific it is hard to recommend a tool. There are some opinions within this newsgroup about the tools. Comparing all of them is worth a report. Kind regards, Joerg |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Jörg Narr" <n_o-sp_amJoerg_Narr (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote Brad, please see my comments inline. "Bradley Plett" <plettb (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:eknci0hp8bvijnq0qcg207t9svb53vt317 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com... We are in the process of trying to find a strategic reporting solution for our company. To that end, I'd like to get some opinions on the strengths and weaknesses of various product, and how they stack up against MS RS. In addition to extending our existing solution and/or using MS RS, some of the solutions we're considering are: Actuate, Business Objects, Cognos ReportNet, dynaSight, Hyperion SQR, MicroStrategy Report Services, Report Portal, etc. dynaSight is the only tool that is built for a slightly different purpose: it is a development environment for building webbased dashboards and mgmt cockipts. Nevertheless you can build reports with it. You will just have to develop a little bit more. Here is our situation. We have a fairly large (400GB) database. We need to be able to generate reports from our data. The reports will be a mixture of pre-developed ("canned") reports and more ad-hoc, user-definable reports. The primary distribution mechanism will be the internet. At present we do not expect much of a distribution process - simply clients bringing up reports in their browsers. All of the above tools will meet this requirement. To date we have hand-coded most of our reports with a combination of ASP.NET/VB.NET and Crystal Reports. However, our reporting requirements are beginning to explode, and we need more of a strategic solution. In particular, we would like to start looking at empowering our end clients (at least some of the more technically sophisticated ones :-) to be able to create and run ad-hoc reports for themselves, without requiring a developer to code each new report. The ad-hoc reports could include anything from simple list reports to complicated reports containing pivot tables, graphs, etc. BO, CRN, MSTR provide webbased report development and ad-hoc-reporting. Actuate and Sqribe use full client tools for building reports. We are a small company with some large clients. The large clients will be viewing reports, but they in turn have smaller clients that may also need to have access to the reports. As a result, one of the things that will be quite important in our final solution is good data-partitioning. Whereas this may be something we need to push down to the database layer, it would be a "very nice to have" if the reporting solution included something to facilitate this as well. All solutions provide some more or less sophisticated load balancing. Since most of them don't store or cache data there is no need to partition data. If your DWH is partitioned though the tools are capable to deal with that. In addition to the data partitioning, we will need some kind of hierarchical security system, with role-based security. Again, this is something that we might be able to push out to Active Directory, but we will be more inclined to have a custom, database-driven solution using Forms Authentication. All of the tools provide this. MS RS to the smalest extend in my opinion. We would like the solution to continue to run in the context of IIS, rather than requiring a separate application server. We would like it to fit into our .NET environment (i.e. not be a J2EE solution). I am sure about BO, CRN, MSTR meet this requirement also. dynaSight doesn't provide an external programming interface. Given all of these constraints, today's version of MS RS may fit our environment best, but comes up a little short on the list. It's possible that when SQL2k5, together with ActiveViews, comes out, it will be a closer match. However, whereas we might be able to wait that long for a solution, it is still unclear whether even that will sufficiently meet our needs. In the mean time, we also need to do due diligence and look at the alternatives. Invite the vendors for a presentation, two hours each and do a workshop with the best ones. Since your requirements weren't very specific it is hard to recommend a tool. There are some opinions within this newsgroup about the tools. Comparing all of them is worth a report. Kind regards, Joerg You may also wish to take a look at Information Builders WebFOCUS (http://www.informationbuilders.com). Both Gartner and Forrester place Information Builders, BO and Cognos as the Leaders in the Business Intelligence space. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |