![]() | |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Anyone out there used Alterian? If so what are the key benefits compared to B.Objects and Cognos? |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
"John Halpin" <john_halpin (AT) blueyonder (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message news:fbSrb.44$Io4.17 (AT) news-binary (DOT) blueyonder.co.uk Anyone out there used Alterian? If so what are the key benefits compared to B.Objects and Cognos? Alterian doesn't compete with OLAP tools like PowerPlay, etc. The only BO product that sort-of competes with Alterian is Set Analyzer. I describe Alterian as one of a group of column-oriented processing products that does high-speeed filtering and set analysis of detailed data, which is the opposite to OLAP. With COP products, you analyse then aggregate, whereas with OLAP, you analyse aggregates and occasionally drill to detail. Both are useful, but you don't use them for the same apps and there's no point comparing products from one group with the other. |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Question for you. Alterian uses the CBAT database methodology. Does Alterian own this methodology or can you actually purchase a database with this ability? Ian "Nigel Pendse" <nigelp.nospam (AT) compuserve (DOT) com> wrote in message news:1068496172.12750.0 (AT) doris (DOT) uk.clara.net... "John Halpin" <john_halpin (AT) blueyonder (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message news:fbSrb.44$Io4.17 (AT) news-binary (DOT) blueyonder.co.uk Anyone out there used Alterian? If so what are the key benefits compared to B.Objects and Cognos? Alterian doesn't compete with OLAP tools like PowerPlay, etc. The only BO product that sort-of competes with Alterian is Set Analyzer. I describe Alterian as one of a group of column-oriented processing products that does high-speeed filtering and set analysis of detailed data, which is the opposite to OLAP. With COP products, you analyse then aggregate, whereas with OLAP, you analyse aggregates and occasionally drill to detail. Both are useful, but you don't use them for the same apps and there's no point comparing products from one group with the other. |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
CBAT is Alterian's name for I what prefer to call Column-Oriented Technology, or COP. It's not a methodology but a type of optimised database. Alterian's implementation is proprietary and unique, but there are a number of other COP products available that do a similar job. So, to answer you question, you can buy other databases based on similar principles, but they won't describe themselves as CBAT as that's Alterian's own name. You can think of COP as being a category of high-performance products that are used for the analysis of large volumes of transaction information, in the same way as MOLAP is used for the analysis of multidimensional data. Both categories use special, highly-optimised databases that, for the particular apps for which they are intended, are far faster and more functional than general-purpose alternatives such as relational databases. But this doesn't man that COP and MOLAP are rhe same thing. "IanS" <ian (AT) blade (DOT) demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:bp31f0$2do$1 (AT) news (DOT) wplus.net Question for you. Alterian uses the CBAT database methodology. Does Alterian own this methodology or can you actually purchase a database with this ability? Ian "Nigel Pendse" <nigelp.nospam (AT) compuserve (DOT) com> wrote in message news:1068496172.12750.0 (AT) doris (DOT) uk.clara.net... "John Halpin" <john_halpin (AT) blueyonder (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message news:fbSrb.44$Io4.17 (AT) news-binary (DOT) blueyonder.co.uk Anyone out there used Alterian? If so what are the key benefits compared to B.Objects and Cognos? Alterian doesn't compete with OLAP tools like PowerPlay, etc. The only BO product that sort-of competes with Alterian is Set Analyzer. I describe Alterian as one of a group of column-oriented processing products that does high-speeed filtering and set analysis of detailed data, which is the opposite to OLAP. With COP products, you analyse then aggregate, whereas with OLAP, you analyse aggregates and occasionally drill to detail. Both are useful, but you don't use them for the same apps and there's no point comparing products from one group with the other. |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
Thanks Nigel. Your reply has cleared a few things up for me. Can you list a few suppliers of COP databases please. Search engines are struggling with the Column-Oriented Technology description. thanks Ian "Nigel Pendse" <nigelp.nospam (AT) compuserve (DOT) com> wrote in message news:1068839173.53782.0 (AT) ersa (DOT) uk.clara.net... CBAT is Alterian's name for I what prefer to call Column-Oriented Technology, or COP. It's not a methodology but a type of optimised database. Alterian's implementation is proprietary and unique, but there are a number of other COP products available that do a similar job. So, to answer you question, you can buy other databases based on similar principles, but they won't describe themselves as CBAT as that's Alterian's own name. You can think of COP as being a category of high-performance products that are used for the analysis of large volumes of transaction information, in the same way as MOLAP is used for the analysis of multidimensional data. Both categories use special, highly-optimised databases that, for the particular apps for which they are intended, are far faster and more functional than general-purpose alternatives such as relational databases. But this doesn't man that COP and MOLAP are rhe same thing. "IanS" <ian (AT) blade (DOT) demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:bp31f0$2do$1 (AT) news (DOT) wplus.net Question for you. Alterian uses the CBAT database methodology. Does Alterian own this methodology or can you actually purchase a database with this ability? Ian "Nigel Pendse" <nigelp.nospam (AT) compuserve (DOT) com> wrote in message news:1068496172.12750.0 (AT) doris (DOT) uk.clara.net... "John Halpin" <john_halpin (AT) blueyonder (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message news:fbSrb.44$Io4.17 (AT) news-binary (DOT) blueyonder.co.uk Anyone out there used Alterian? If so what are the key benefits compared to B.Objects and Cognos? Alterian doesn't compete with OLAP tools like PowerPlay, etc. The only BO product that sort-of competes with Alterian is Set Analyzer. I describe Alterian as one of a group of column-oriented processing products that does high-speeed filtering and set analysis of detailed data, which is the opposite to OLAP. With COP products, you analyse then aggregate, whereas with OLAP, you analyse aggregates and occasionally drill to detail. Both are useful, but you don't use them for the same apps and there's no point comparing products from one group with the other. |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hello John, you can definitely get this technology from Sybase (IQ) and SAND (Analytic Server). Both use quite similar techniques as descriped by Steve Tolkin in the "Taxir" thread. To keep the story simple both vendors use algorithms that highly compress the source data and only keep one occurance of every attribute stored. This means that you will find in a per se "normalized" attribute only one occurance of "John" and in another only one occurance of the value field "12.5" (USD). This contributes a lot to a good ratio between source data and data base size. The databases make intensive use of pointers to this occurances. Both also use index techniques. SAND uses implicit indexes, Sybase IQ additionally allows administrators to define several indexes. Due to this form of data storage you have implicit partitioning and both vendors calculate fields which store data like the number of total rows or distinct occurances as metadata to each column. Both tools are especially suitable for analytic analysis as being done for aCRM or aSCM and offer very good response times i. e. for dynamically involved filtes. Also both vendors provide a normal OLE DB or ODBC interface to query the data base using SQL. Whilst SAND Analytic Server can be reduced to a "high performance" analytic platform, Sybase offers a much broader range of products especially for database and data model design, Enterprise Application Integration (EAI not ETL) and supports decentralized data storage (Hub and Spoke architectures) quite well. Kind regards, Joerg |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
I don't know the other tools mentioned by Nigel. But you might most probably also find similar techniques in this other tools. J. "Joerg Narr" <n_o_s_p_a_m_joerg_narr (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:bpi2ah$1nfeij$1 (AT) ID-25239 (DOT) news.uni-berlin.de... Hello John, you can definitely get this technology from Sybase (IQ) and SAND (Analytic Server). Both use quite similar techniques as descriped by Steve Tolkin in the "Taxir" thread. To keep the story simple both vendors use algorithms that highly compress the source data and only keep one occurance of every attribute stored. This means that you will find in a per se "normalized" attribute only one occurance of "John" and in another only one occurance of the value field "12.5" (USD). This contributes a lot to a good ratio between source data and data base size. The databases make intensive use of pointers to this occurances. Both also use index techniques. SAND uses implicit indexes, Sybase IQ additionally allows administrators to define several indexes. Due to this form of data storage you have implicit partitioning and both vendors calculate fields which store data like the number of total rows or distinct occurances as metadata to each column. Both tools are especially suitable for analytic analysis as being done for aCRM or aSCM and offer very good response times i. e. for dynamically involved filtes. Also both vendors provide a normal OLE DB or ODBC interface to query the data base using SQL. Whilst SAND Analytic Server can be reduced to a "high performance" analytic platform, Sybase offers a much broader range of products especially for database and data model design, Enterprise Application Integration (EAI not ETL) and supports decentralized data storage (Hub and Spoke architectures) quite well. Kind regards, Joerg |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |