In article <4b45d3ad.0311301442.31281a4e (AT) posting (DOT) google.com>,
neo55592 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com (Neo) wrote:
Quote:
XDb is a small experimental database for Windows and Pocket PCs.
For more info and an updated version, visit www.xdb1.com |
Why doesn't http://www.xdb1.com/Basics/TDM.asp show OO as having the
concepts of relationships?
It gives the impression you're trying to make your TDM model look better
than others by omission, rather than giving a clear comparison.
How is it different from Mainstay's Phyla, eg: as reviewed at
<http://www.tidbits.com/tb-issues/TidBITS-160.html> apart from the
obvious aspect of being available as a callable DLL?
The GUI and ability to navigate down through a connected, possibly
cyclic graph, just by opening successive levels in a tree are certainly
similar.
I'm not saying you copied anything but (as I've often found!) other
people have bright ideas too, hence the (now neglected?) test of
"obviousness" in patent examination.
--
Andy Dent BSc MACS AACM
OOFILE - Database, Reports, Graphs, GUI for c++ on Mac, Unix & Windows
PP2MFC - PowerPlant->MFC portability
http://www.oofile.com.au/