![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
I have looked at doing large relational databases for a couple ideas that I have had for some social network style projects, but never could fully come to a method that I would be happy with. Since DB's have a one to one, one to many, and many to one relation that would be just about all we could work with. With social networking theory you break them in groups, nodes, branches, and hubs. That said you would have to have a raw database with each users one to one relation(s). From that you could query your entire DB to find groups, and hubs then build a 2nd DB with these hubs/groups and their members (Nodes I think). That way you could say something in the effect of person/item (a) is part of or has a one to one relation to (x) hub/group, and person (b) has one relation to (z) hub/group, and group (z) is connected to group (x), by group (c)>(d)>(m). Thus you would only have to find the two users closes hub(s) and then query the database step by step to the next hub(less queries). Mapping logic... If anyone else has any information on the subject I would also like to hear what they have to say on it. |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
thanks a lot for your feedback... right now I'll work on 2 levels only , and doing simple queries a user A has 1st level relationship (let's say 30 other users) at 2nd level this 30 people may also have their own 1st level relationship, which gives A a second level relationship of 900 users.. that's all for now... I'll write the methods to handle that |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 15.01.2007 12:49, Josselin wrote: thanks a lot for your feedback... right now I'll work on 2 levels only , and doing simple queries a user A has 1st level relationship (let's say 30 other users) at 2nd level this 30 people may also have their own 1st level relationship, which gives A a second level relationship of 900 users.. that's all for now... I'll write the methods to handle that You can deal with fixed level of nesting queries in a single SELECT statement - SQL just chokes on the unlimited recursion (unless you are on Oracle and can use CONNECT BY). Kind regards robert |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |