![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hello, I am wondering if anyone could help me in choosing a right training course. My company has agreed to send me on a training course for sql server administration. However it is up to me to choose the right training course available. i have recently took up a job of sql 2000 dba from a developer position. i have worked on t-sql for years but from past few months i am also manaing the sql 2000 databases. now my company wants to send me for comprehensive MCDBA training. However i am bit reluctant to accept that as i heard from quiet a few poeple that MCDBA is going to be outdated and i should prefer going for MCTS 2005. But i am afreaid if i get trained on 2005 would i be able to manage 2000 databases efficiently. Morever my compnay haven't got any plans of migrating to 2005 in near future but eventually will do that i believe. I also have following doubts... 1. Will MCTS hold more weightage than mcdba? 2. Would MCTS help in my career more than MCTS 3. Is MCTS 2005 training would help me doing my dba job smoothly on 2000 databases? Please help me in making the right decision. Thanks, A. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hello, I am wondering if anyone could help me in choosing a right training course. My company has agreed to send me on a training course for sql server administration. However it is up to me to choose the right training course available. i have recently took up a job of sql 2000 dba from a developer position. i have worked on t-sql for years but from past few months i am also manaing the sql 2000 databases. now my company wants to send me for comprehensive MCDBA training. However i am bit reluctant to accept that as i heard from quiet a few poeple that MCDBA is going to be outdated and i should prefer going for MCTS 2005. But i am afreaid if i get trained on 2005 would i be able to manage 2000 databases efficiently. Morever my compnay haven't got any plans of migrating to 2005 in near future but eventually will do that i believe. I also have following doubts... 1. Will MCTS hold more weightage than mcdba? 2. Would MCTS help in my career more than MCTS 3. Is MCTS 2005 training would help me doing my dba job smoothly on 2000 databases? Please help me in making the right decision. Thanks, A. |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
1. Not really. The TS is easier, but more "modern". If hiring I would give a slight edge to the TS. Either shows commitment. 2. Probably. 3. Yes. "AK" <arshad.k... (AT) policyadmin (DOT) co.uk> wrote in message news:1173440649.016004.12680 (AT) n33g2000cwc (DOT) googlegroups.com... Hello, I am wondering if anyone could help me in choosing a right training course. My company has agreed to send me on a training course for sql server administration. However it is up to me to choose the right training course available. i have recently took up a job of sql 2000 dba from a developer position. i have worked on t-sql for years but from past few months i am also manaing the sql 2000 databases. now my company wants to send me for comprehensive MCDBA training. However i am bit reluctant to accept that as i heard from quiet a few poeple that MCDBA is going to be outdated and i should prefer going for MCTS 2005. But i am afreaid if i get trained on 2005 would i be able to manage 2000 databases efficiently. Morever my compnay haven't got any plans of migrating to 2005 in near future but eventually will do that i believe. I also have following doubts... 1. Will MCTS hold more weightage than mcdba? 2. Would MCTS help in my career more than MCTS 3. Is MCTS 2005 training would help me doing my dba job smoothly on 2000 databases? Please help me in making the right decision. Thanks, A.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |