So why is item #1 to be considered, yet items #4 and #9 are bad? Item #1 is
the beginning of one of these reset sequences (since there are no data
before it), yet it is considered to be valid.

--
Tom

----------------------------------------------------
Thomas A. Moreau, BSc, PhD, MCSE, MCDBA
SQL Server MVP
Toronto, ON Canada
..
<sucaba.r (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote

My apology for not making myself clear enough, and yes it's real-world.
Thanks again for all the help guys.