dbTalk Databases Forums  

SQL Configuration

comp.databases.ms-sqlserver comp.databases.ms-sqlserver


Discuss SQL Configuration in the comp.databases.ms-sqlserver forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old   
Erland Sommarskog
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: SQL Configuration - 10-03-2007 , 04:44 PM






Neil (nospam (AT) nospam (DOT) net) writes:
Quote:
First, re. the 2 GB of RAM, considering that the db is not huge (two
main tables have about 60,000 records each; a few other tables with a
few thousand records; and then a bunch of smaller records); there are
only about 50 users max; most of the activity is read-only, very little
writing; and the hardware is brand new; do you think that would be
enough, or should I push for more? I wouldn't count on the database
being well-tuned.
More memory is not going to hurt, but the database size you indicate
certainly does not scare me.

Quote:
Second, re. the size of the disks, when you said "make sure there is at
least 50 GB," wasn't sure if you meant 50 GB total, or 50 GB free space
after SQL Server is installed. Here are the specs for the disks:
I meant 50 GB in total. You are not going to fill up 36 GB on the spot,
but the strategy of Microsoft definitely is to bury a lot of stuff under
C:\Windows.


--
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel (AT) sommarskog (DOT) se

Books Online for SQL Server 2005 at
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro...ads/books.mspx
Books Online for SQL Server 2000 at
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinf...ons/books.mspx


Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old   
Neil
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: SQL Configuration - 10-04-2007 , 12:59 AM






Well, the sys admin went ahead and moved SQL Server to the D drive, when I
questioned him about it, even though I told him I'd get back to him about
it. So now SQL's on the D drive with 204 GB. But you said that most of it
will still remain on the C drive anyway. But maybe having the parts that are
on the D drive there will help the system disk.

Thanks.

"Erland Sommarskog" <esquel (AT) sommarskog (DOT) se> wrote

Quote:
Neil (nospam (AT) nospam (DOT) net) writes:
First, re. the 2 GB of RAM, considering that the db is not huge (two
main tables have about 60,000 records each; a few other tables with a
few thousand records; and then a bunch of smaller records); there are
only about 50 users max; most of the activity is read-only, very little
writing; and the hardware is brand new; do you think that would be
enough, or should I push for more? I wouldn't count on the database
being well-tuned.

More memory is not going to hurt, but the database size you indicate
certainly does not scare me.

Second, re. the size of the disks, when you said "make sure there is at
least 50 GB," wasn't sure if you meant 50 GB total, or 50 GB free space
after SQL Server is installed. Here are the specs for the disks:

I meant 50 GB in total. You are not going to fill up 36 GB on the spot,
but the strategy of Microsoft definitely is to bury a lot of stuff under
C:\Windows.


--
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel (AT) sommarskog (DOT) se

Books Online for SQL Server 2005 at
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro...ads/books.mspx
Books Online for SQL Server 2000 at
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinf...ons/books.mspx



Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.