![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
We recently upgraded our MS SQL Server 2000 to 2005. Here is what we did: 1. Perform backup of the database from the old server. 2. Created a blank database in the new server. 3. Restored the database into the blank database located in the new server. After this process, there was an obvious slowness in the MS Access application. Program-wise, I did not do any code changes. The only thing that we did was just this upgrade. I am leaning towards the netwok causing the slowness. But I do not know the issues that might slow down the application just because we upgraded the same database into SQL 2005. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
The hardware configuration below: - Has two Intel Quad-Core Xeon processors - 10GB of RAM - 15,000RPM SATA hard drives The old server was just a regular P4, 4G RAM. |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
We recently upgraded our MS SQL Server 2000 to 2005. Here is what we did: 1. Perform backup of the database from the old server. 2. Created a blank database in the new server. 3. Restored the database into the blank database located in the new server. After this process, there was an obvious slowness in the MS Access application. Program-wise, I did not do any code changes. The only thing that we did was just this upgrade. I am leaning towards the netwok causing the slowness. But I do not know the issues that might slow down the application just because we upgraded the same database into SQL 2005. |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
Ben (pillars4 (AT) sbcglobal (DOT) net) writes: We recently upgraded our MS SQL Server 2000 to 2005. Here is what we did: 1. Perform backup of the database from the old server. 2. Created a blank database in the new server. 3. Restored the database into the blank database located in the new server. After this process, there was an obvious slowness in the MS Access application. Program-wise, I did not do any code changes. The only thing that we did was just this upgrade. I am leaning towards the netwok causing the slowness. But I do not know the issues that might slow down the application just because we upgraded the same database into SQL 2005. Stastistics were invalidated when you upgraded to SQL 2005, so you need to run sp_updatstats. If that does not help, you need to analyse more closely what is slow. It's possible that the optimizer makes a different decision for some queries to the worse. Also, I would recommend that you try running the database in compatibility level 90. If you restored the database and did nothing more, it is in level 80. This is not likely to affect performance, but it may prevent you from using new features in SQL 2005 later on. On the other hand, there may be compatibility issues causing your queries to fail in level 90. You can switch back to 80 if this happens. -- Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel (AT) sommarskog (DOT) se Books Online for SQL Server 2005 at http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro...ads/books.mspx Books Online for SQL Server 2000 at http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinf...ons/books.mspx |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |