![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Could somebody kindly tell me what conventions and best practices are used when naming a database server (not the database itself) and/or a cluster of database servers? |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
pbd22 wrote: Could somebody kindly tell me what conventions and best practices are used when naming a database server (not the database itself) and/or a cluster of database servers? http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1178.txth...ngschemes.com/ |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Could somebody kindly tell me what conventions and best practices are used when naming a database server (not the database itself) and/or a |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
Could somebody kindly tell me what conventions and best practices are used when naming a database server (not the database itself) and/or a cluster of database servers? The ISO-11179 Standards are for data elements names. No help there. I guess you would have to use the prinicple of "least surprise" -- i.e. can someone in the field understand/guess the name used? I know that geeks pick a theme like a TV show (Star Trek, South Park, etc.). I worked at a shop that used the ethnic origins of the personnel -- until I got there (nobody could spell "Czechoslovakia" consistently, even me!) |
#6
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
for www.somesite.com would the database server and associated drives look something like this: database server: data.somesite.com |
|
various drives on the database server: db1.data.somesite.com, db2.data.somesite.com, db3.data.somesite.com, and so on... anybody out there build a database cluster before? how did you handle naming? |
|
finally, I am noticing that really big sites such as yahoo and hotmail use garbage in their namespace. So, for example, this is hotmail: by138w.bay138.mail.live.com |
|
is there an advantage to using a less obvious naming convention? responses appreciated! |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |