![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I'm planning to transport a desktop application to the web. A spin-off of this application has already been put on the web by another programmer. He used ColdFusion with MS SQL, Access, VC, and Java. It is faster than the desktop application (written in VFP). 1. Can I get the same results using MS SQL Express Advanced and Access for the internet version if used with .net? 2. Are the select statements limited in power, accuracy, size, etc. for MS SQL Express Advanced when compared to SQL? 3. If Access will perform poorly, can VFP be used instead with .net? I already know it can't be used with ColdFusion. 4. If MS Express Advanced will not sufficiently replace SQL, will MySQL do the job better? Thanks |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
I'm planning to transport a desktop application to the web. A spin-off of this application has already been put on the web by another programmer. He used ColdFusion with MS SQL, Access, VC, and Java. It is faster than the desktop application (written in VFP). 1. Can I get the same results using MS SQL Express Advanced and Access for the internet version if used with .net? |
|
2. Are the select statements limited in power, accuracy, size, etc. for MS SQL Express Advanced when compared to SQL? |
|
3. If Access will perform poorly, can VFP be used instead with .net? I already know it can't be used with ColdFusion. 4. If MS Express Advanced will not sufficiently replace SQL, will MySQL do the job better? |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Jul 22, 5:31 pm, <wipeou... (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote: I'm planning to transport a desktop application to the web. A spin-off of this application has already been put on the web by another programmer. He used ColdFusion with MS SQL, Access, VC, and Java. It is faster than the desktop application (written in VFP). 1. Can I get the same results using MS SQL Express Advanced and Access for the internet version if used with .net? 2. Are the select statements limited in power, accuracy, size, etc. for MS SQL Express Advanced when compared to SQL? 3. If Access will perform poorly, can VFP be used instead with .net? I already know it can't be used with ColdFusion. 4. If MS Express Advanced will not sufficiently replace SQL, will MySQL do the job better? Thanks I don't know nothing, but I can attest that MS SQL Server is not compatible with MySQL--lots of commands are different. For pure speed, I "heard in the street" that Oracle's version of SQL is faster than MSFT's. But, because MSFT uses a different protocol for starting and stopping transactions (for multiuser databases, involving ROLLBACK), it is slower but in theory "more safe" than Oracle (small victory for MSFT, since usually speed trumps safety). MySQL also uses the "MSFT" protocol, so is slower than ORCL for transactions. MS Express has extensions to SQL but I doubt it will "replace" SQL. Nor will any proprietary extension of SQL. I like MS SQL Server 2005 because it is integrated better into my API (C# using VS2005), but to be honest MySQL extensions for subqueries are more intutitive for me. But MySQL lags in development to MSFT-- for example versions 4.x did not have Stored Procedures or Views (!). And, like I say, I don't like the hassle of translating MySQL <--> MS SQL Server 2005. If you spend $50 you can get the "developer" version of MS SQL Server 2005; highly recommended and superior to the free version. Spend the fifty bucks. Remember, I don't know much about SQL, but these are my newbie thoughts. RL |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
(wipeout64 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com) writes: I'm planning to transport a desktop application to the web. A spin-off of this application has already been put on the web by another programmer. He used ColdFusion with MS SQL, Access, VC, and Java. It is faster than the desktop application (written in VFP). 1. Can I get the same results using MS SQL Express Advanced and Access for the internet version if used with .net? Probably. But you could also get worse performance. It's difficult to answer, because it depends on how you do the implementation. DB engines are extremely powerful tools to make things to really slow if you don't do things right. 2. Are the select statements limited in power, accuracy, size, etc. for MS SQL Express Advanced when compared to SQL? Compared to what? If you mean if there are limitations in SQL Express vs. the paid-for editions of SQL Server, the answer is, yes, there are some limitations, but it is not all likely that you will suffer from them. First of all, the language is the same, so the SELECT statements that runs in Enterprise Edition runs in SQL Express too. And there is no difference in accuracy, and hardly in size of the statements either. There is a difference in database size: with SQL Express, you cannot have databases over 4GB in size. The difference in performance lies in some special optimizer tweaks, like considering using indexed view. But for the major bulk of queries, query plans and performance are the same. 3. If Access will perform poorly, can VFP be used instead with .net? I already know it can't be used with ColdFusion. 4. If MS Express Advanced will not sufficiently replace SQL, will MySQL do the job better? Those questions are completely beyond the scope for this newsgroup, and also beyond my knowledge. -- Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel (AT) sommarskog (DOT) se Books Online for SQL Server 2005 at http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro...ads/books.mspx Books Online for SQL Server 2000 at http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinf...ons/books.mspx |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
Your answers are very helpful! Now a rather niave question: If I pay for a site to host my application, does that mean I don't have to purchase the server software and I only need the developer software? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |