![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
In Access I build reports using temporary tables in the front end. But when putting my Access on SharePoint I can't do that. Any tips for how to compile report data using SharePoint? Thanks! |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Neil" wrote in message news:jnfkf1$oln$1 (AT) dont-email (DOT) me... In Access I build reports using temporary tables in the front end. But when putting my Access on SharePoint I can't do that. Any tips for how to compile report data using SharePoint? Thanks! I can quite much say from experience that applications that use temp tables really break down and work poor with on-line. It not a practial option right now. One of my suggestions and less then ideal workarounds is to publish the web application, but built + use the reports in the Access client. You can the most certainly send data out to some local (linked) tables on the users. So in this case, the munching + crunching of data occurs local. So, the suggesting for such types of reporting is to use the Access client. -- Albert D. Kallal Edmonton, Alberta Canada PleaseNoSpam_kallal (AT) msn (DOT) com |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
I know in SQL Server you can create temp tables. No such option in SharePoint? I appreciate the suggestion. Unfortunately, not doable in this case. |
|
My client (for whom I'm building the database) uses Access, and I have the reports in Access. No problem. But their client, for whom they're processing the data, want to be able to view the data online. Hence the SharePoint component. In other words, the whole reason we're using SharePoint is for the client to be able to query their data online in a browser. One option I thought of, if true temp tables aren't available, is to have reporting tables, same as the local Access tables, but use a unique ID for each report. Then, instead of the report needing exclusive access to the table, it would only need the records with that unique ID. Then, when the report is done, the records with that ID can be deleted. Of course, that would cause serious table bloating over time. But I assume that there would be some kind of compacting done on the server side as part of routine maintenance? That's the only solution I can think of. Surely there must be a method that people use to build reports with..... Thanks! "Albert D. Kallal" <PleaseNOSpamkallal (AT) msn (DOT) com> wrote in message news:kXJmr.14976$DB1.11149 (AT) newsfe03 (DOT) iad... "Neil" wrote in message news:jnfkf1$oln$1 (AT) dont-email (DOT) me... In Access I build reports using temporary tables in the front end. But when putting my Access on SharePoint I can't do that. Any tips for how to compile report data using SharePoint? Thanks! I can quite much say from experience that applications that use temp tables really break down and work poor with on-line. It not a practial option right now. One of my suggestions and less then ideal workarounds is to publish the web application, but built + use the reports in the Access client. You can the most certainly send data out to some local (linked) tables on the users. So in this case, the munching + crunching of data occurs local. So, the suggesting for such types of reporting is to use the Access client. -- Albert D. Kallal Edmonton, Alberta Canada PleaseNoSpam_kallal (AT) msn (DOT) com |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
In Access I build reports using temporary tables in the front end. But when putting my Access on SharePoint I can't do that. Any tips for how to compile report data using SharePoint? Thanks! |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 00:10:37 -0500, "Neil" neil.ginsberg+newsgroup (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote: I know in SQL Server you can create temp tables. No such option in SharePoint? I appreciate the suggestion. Unfortunately, not doable in this case. Not for me either. Thanks for your post! It saved me from doing further research on rewriting our software for Sharepoint, etc... |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
Depending on why/how you employ the temporary tables, you might be able to build them in an Access database app in the user's machine, run and create a PDF from the report, and upload the PDF to Sharepoint, or to a Sharepoint file/list. |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
In Access I build reports using temporary tables in the front end. But when putting my Access on SharePoint I can't do that. Any tips for how to compile report data using SharePoint? Thanks! |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
In Access I build reports using temporary tables in the front end. But when putting my Access on SharePoint I can't do that. Any tips for how to compile report data using SharePoint? Thanks! |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Patrick Finucane" <patrickfinucan... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote in message news:919dbcde-cad0-4feb-b508-8476e981423b (AT) t16g2000yqt (DOT) googlegroups.com... On Apr 27, 9:24 pm, "Neil" <neil.ginsberg+newsgr... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote: In Access I build reports using temporary tables in the front end. But when putting my Access on SharePoint I can't do that. Any tips for how to compile report data using SharePoint? Thanks! Are your temp tables finite in count and are the field names the same for a specific report? *If so, can you create a blank "holding" table that mimics each temp table and link all the temp tables together via a Tempvars!ID value? =========================== Yes, I could do that. I was thinking of doing something along those lines.. Was thinking, though, of using a table with an autonumber field, adding a record to it, and then using the ID value to link the tables. Is that basically what you're saying, but to assign the ID value to tempvar and use it that way? Also, at what point would I clear the temp data? With my temp tables I'm just clearing the temp data before the report is run. But with multiple users using the same table, obviously I wouldn't be able to delete the entire table. So when would I delete the data associate with the tempvars!ID value? Thanks! |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |