![]() | |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Now, one of the recent program that I've created, I noticed how complex it is and how much code it requires. I'm not concerned with the coding but with the "back end" db. See, in all my DB's I have a mde file on the client computer with the forms, reports, etc. and the 'back end" on a NT Server (we are converting to Win2k Server soon). I have noticed how slow the writting to the "back end" db is and sometimes the data is not saved right. |
|
I was thinking on continuing programing in MS Access but the "back end" on a server with DB2 or Oracle (or any other for that matter). To be honest, I have very little knowlege about both of them. |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
EI User <fenixb99 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote: Now, one of the recent program that I've created, I noticed how complex it is and how much code it requires. I'm not concerned with the coding but with the "back end" db. See, in all my DB's I have a mde file on the client computer with the forms, reports, etc. and the 'back end" on a NT Server (we are converting to Win2k Server soon). I have noticed how slow the writting to the "back end" db is and sometimes the data is not saved right. The three most common performance problems in Access 2000 or newer are: - LDB locking which a persistent recordset connection or an always open bound form corrects (multiple users) - sub datasheet Name property set to [Auto] should be [None] - Track name AutoCorrect should be off If the problem is for everyone when starting up the MDB then it likely needs a decompile. For more information on these, less likely causes, other tips and links to MS KB articles visit my Access Performance FAQ page at http://www.granite.ab.ca/access/performancefaq.htm I was thinking on continuing programing in MS Access but the "back end" on a server with DB2 or Oracle (or any other for that matter). To be honest, I have very little knowlege about both of them. I'd suggest SQL Server/MSDE. Partially because MSDE is free. Mind you it is throttled to five processes, which is *not* the same as five users. And because MSDE/SQL Server will integrate better with Access. Tony |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |