dbTalk Databases Forums  

Re: repeat: New version of Access doesn't support Jet

comp.databases.ms-access comp.databases.ms-access


Discuss Re: repeat: New version of Access doesn't support Jet in the comp.databases.ms-access forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old   
a a r o n . k e m p f @gmail.com [MCITP: DBA]
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: repeat: New version of Access doesn't support Jet - 05-19-2011 , 07:41 PM






you can easily right-click import Access Reports into SQL Server
Reporting Services

NOW YOU CAN EXPORT TO WORD AND IT DOES NOT LOOK AWFUL!!!




On May 6, 3:04*pm, "James A. Fortune" <CDMAPos... (AT) FortuneJames (DOT) com>
wrote:
Quote:
On May 4, 6:35*pm, "Albert D. Kallal" <PleaseNOOOsPAMmkal... (AT) msn (DOT) com
wrote:









"James A. Fortune" *wrote in messagenews:21819a07-8c68-47d7-8a30-938fde64cce4 (AT) l6g2000vbn (DOT) googlegroups.com...

If LightSwitch starts out with managed
code, then its logical extension would be a jump to VS, not Access.
Access 2010 tried to keep the same two hats while putting on a third!
That is, it tried to add the third hat of becoming a RAD tool for the
web.

In terms of access having support for sharepoint or now office 365, I think
we have a far better play in this regards.

All be the first to admit that it with access web services, having to adopt
sharepoint is too high a price for the average access developer market.

However I'm playing with office 365 right now, and the results are really
wonderful. And with a small business package, it looks like we're gonnasee
some really reasonable cost numbers.

I'm always interested in reasonable cost numbers. *Keep us posted.



What I'd like to see is a converter that takes an Access database
connected to SQL Server and creates a VS project with three tiers and
all the underlying managed code necessary to output the reports into
either a PDF file or a WPF format. *That would be RAD :-). *Then
Access could do what it does best.

Well first of all the last two versions of access does have native reprots
to PDF and does so without a pdf printer driver. So PDF support is now built
into Access.

Hopefully, everyone knows that PDF output is possible from Access.
I'd need PDF output from the hypothetical 'Access converted into VS
project'.



In fact the really issue or thing that I think as an Access community will
run into with regards to Access web development is the need for that easy
plug in extensibility to the web development environment that we've always
had on the desktop. To me this is the challenge, but also the key to the
future of access web version services. However with the announcement of
office 365, and the fact that it'll support access web services, we've at
least now crossed one bridge that will result in an easy and widespread
affordability for access web publishing.

For web sites that really impress, I'm really liking the JQuery
capabilities that got added into VS. *It's very exciting. *I don't see
Access yet as a RAD web tool, but I'll certainly be taking a close
look at its web capabilities. *Maybe MS will add JQuery to Access' web
tools in a future version?

James A. Fortune
CDMAPos... (AT) FortuneJames (DOT) com

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old   
a a r o n . k e m p f @gmail.com [MCITP: DBA]
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: repeat: New version of Access doesn't support Jet - 05-19-2011 , 07:42 PM






Access is worthless. It's not reliable enough. ONLY AN IDIOT WOULD
USE IT FOR ANYTHING.

If / when I run into people that use Jet-- I get them fired and then
spit on them.

-Aaron




On May 7, 8:58*pm, "Access Developer" <accde... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:
Quote:
*<aaron.ke... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote

*> Access / Jet sucks balls old man. It is
*> IMPOSSIBLE to make Jet perform
*> well in a multi-user environment.

(1) Whether it does or not, Mr. Kempf, you are dodging the issue. *You
claimed that LightSwitch is a "new version of Access", which it is not, thus
giving Yet Another Example of your not knowing whereof you speak.

(2) Within their size, number of users, and network limitations (all of
which are well-known for years), Access and Jet have, indeed, performed well
in multiuser environments. *Anyone who would deem it "worthless" simply
because it is not (and is/was not intended to be) an enterprise level
database and UI combination is, at best, a dunderhead.

On May 2, 4:09 pm, "Access Developer" <accde... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:







Mr. Kempf, I just wonder why you feel so compelled to denigrate Access
that
you misrepresent facts, time after time. FYI, the answer to the title of
the article reference is "No, LightSwitch isn't the 'new Access'."
Microsoft has never represented it as such, much less as a "new versionof
Access".

--
Larry Linson, Microsoft Office Access MVP
Co-author: "Microsoft Access Small Business Solutions", published by Wiley
Access newsgroup support is alive and well in USENET
comp.databases.ms-access

aaron.ke... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote

http://visualstudiomagazine.com/arti...vb_using-light....

Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.