Ron Weiner <NoOne (AT) NoWare (DOT) NutThing> wrote in
news:ipakc1$tq0$1 (AT) dont-email (DOT) me:
Quote:
Could it be cracked? Yea you betcha', but the effort required
would eliminate all but the most determined and knowledgeable
persons. Again we are willing to live with that level of risk. |
But really, the question here comes down to how much work you're
willing to do to get to the point that you can say what you've just
said above.
From my point of view, the bar is not very high. If someone really
wants to steal my work, they'll manage to do so -- nothing I can do
to stop them -- so I don't spend a lot of effort convoluting my work
in order to ineffectively prevent this. And I'd definitely say
there's an 80/20 rule involved here, in that the easiest methods of
obfuscation (like Access's built-in encryption) get you 80% for
virtually no work, while getting the remainder requires a huge
amount of planning and effort.
To me, it's not worth it.
Others may come down with a different balance point for that, as you
have, but everybody is making exactly the same calculation -- using
imperfect means to try to secure something that can't be made
completely safe under any circumstances.
--
David W. Fenton http://www.dfenton.com/
contact via website only http://www.dfenton.com/DFA/